Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do you agree with Lindsey Lohan playing Elizabeth Taylor?

I don't.

Update:

I agree with you. She is not pretty at all anymore. She is a drug addict/drunk and because of all the trouble she's been in, she should be black-balled from Hollywood. It's an insult to Elizabeth Taylor to have trash like her playing her on screen. Shameful. I will not watch it.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago

    I agree with you to a cetain extent that it is somewhat of an insult to have Lindsay Lohan playing Elizabeth Taylor but you also have to keep in mind that Elizabeth Taylor was no angel herself (not trying to discredit Elizabeth Taylor, just stating facts). Elizabeth Taylor was married 8 times and also had a drug and alcohol problem, and I think that's what the directors was probably looking at when they cast Lindsay for the role. They probably figured that if anyone could relate to Elizabeth Taylor it would probably be Lindsay Lohan. I guess they figured that Elizabeth Taylor and Lindsay Lohan both went through similar issues (drugs, alcohol, been in a lot of relationships) why not have Lindsay play Elizabeth? Plus, Lindsay Lohan is a good actress.

    I don't know. I guess it just depends on how you look at it.

  • 8 years ago

    First of all slow your roll and hold your horses , it's a lifetime movie not a movie in theaters , Liz Taylor was no saint and made mistakes and got married like more than ten times, she broke up two marriages , went to the Betty Ford clinic like Lindsay did, was prescribed to pills and addicted to them like Lindsay who also went to the Betty Ford clinic, so if Lindsay Lohan is so ugly let's see a picture of you..... The pot calling the kettle black ;) no offense.

    Source(s): I saw the movie and liked it , I give it 3 out 5.
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Nope. People Magazine gave it 2/4 stars! I was going to watch the movie but now I think Lohan is ridiculous trying to make money after she did a lot of wrong (ex: stealing, drugs, etc). Here is the review in case you want to read it: http://www.people.com/people/mobile/article/0,,206...

  • 9 years ago

    I think they should have someone more respectable play her. And I cant watch her play Elizabeth Taylor because her acting is horrible.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    no, because Lindsey Lohan has been bad for a while. Idk why the director chose her for what she has been doing! Lindsey is not as pretty as Elizabeth Taylor, NOT EVEN CLOSE!

    Source(s): me
  • 9 years ago

    They're both junkies, don't see why shes bad for the role. She was around before the TMZ era but she was doing all kinds of stuff

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Sherilyn Fenn could have been a astounding selection. i think of the "Lifetime" community replaced into searching for an aim audience and that they went with LL. She does have some followers. i'm no longer one. yet i don't sense like "rooting" for her(LL) to fail is a sturdy factor. particular, better appearing alternatives have been obtainable. yet desiring somebody to Fail...i won't be able to dig that. So,that being suggested. LL is known for some issues over right here. One is being a great Time F*ck Up. optimistically she would be able to turn that around. And signify the Elizabeth Taylor all of us enjoyed. I doubt it nevertheless. BQ: Fenn.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    disagree!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.