Can any lib explain what "fair and balanced" approach means?

Although I disagree with it, Obama has put Medicare and Social Security on the table for spending cuts. I have not seen on person on the conservative side sign on to cuts in the military.

Fair and balanced taxation - people who sit on their butts selling their stocks (capital gains) should be taxed at the same marginal rates as people who work for their money. Income is income.

The first 250,000 or 500,000 should keep the same marginal. rates, income amounts higher than that should revert to the rates that existed before the Bush tax cuts. Everybody gets the same break on the first portion of their income.

That is the fair and balanced approached. Now, you will probably come back with a smart aleck remark about how what I just said is not either fair or balanced, don't bother, I am off to grub away at my job. Yes, a liberal who works. Hard. Every day. For the last 35 years, and 7 years before that (took a break to stay home and raise my kids with excellent family values). Sorry if that doesn't fit everyone's stereotype of a liberal.....

For any Lib to give an honest answer to your question, they would have to understand how things actually happen in reality.

So, I will explain it to you from a Independent point of view.

For something to be fair and balanced, then we must punish those that 'earn' their way through life and reward those that do not 'earn' anything at all. That's the definition of fair and balanced. For example: If someone wants to go to Harvard then they should be able to, whether they have money or not, whether they have the criteria or not, and whether they are able or not.

Now do you understand.

To me "social justice" way justice being granted in an evenhanded and equal method for all society. "fair trade" is self explanatory. "development" can also be self explanatory. The whole lot we have now ever labored for as a nation contained social justice and fair trade and had the intention of progress. When the steam engine was utilized to the American frontier, we had progress which spread out fair alternate and allowed us to improve social justice. This is only one of hundreds of thousands of examples of american social justice and free trade via the course of progression. What would you have got us do? Be run by using one all mighty organization that had the power to deal with individuals it disagreed with as 2nd category residents, denied them the proper to do alternate or go into business for themselves, and avoided all types of scientific and human advancement? That's exactly what you might get without social justice, reasonable alternate, and progress. Why does it continually have got to boil down to 1 severe or the other?

He means fair and balanced, instead of the middle class paying more taxes and the rich paying no more like Republicans wanted when they tried to let payroll taxes expire and not taxes for the ultra-rich.

I hope this helps.

Increase taxes, cut spending. It is the fastest and most sustainable way to eliminate the deficit and debt. Barry has put spending cuts on the table, CONnies are just pissed that he is not willing to throw the poorest Americans under the bus.

The republican led house brought 60 bills to the floor to NAME post offices. They did not allow a single bill to fix the fiscal insolvency problem of the post office to be addressed. So don't get confused mr. s**t for brains.

Edit: Don't you love how, when faced with an unpleasant truth, your typical conservative will pretend that it just doesn't exist or didn't happen? So here you have it. So... s**thead... no pithy response for me?

Something like Fox News, I think.

For a liberal to declare something fair and balanced, he must agree with it.

IT MEANS HIGHER TAXES AND MORE GOVERNMENT SPENDING