Is it right to take the fruits of one's labor and give it to another able bodied person?

No, we need to go back to work or starve.

That is pretty well the basis for all working human societies. It is better, in my view, to distribute a little to everyone, than letting a few individuals take the rewards of the efforts of the bulk of the people.

But no matter how you cut it, no one is totally and uniquely responsible for everything that they produce, no one is free from benefitting from the work of others. the question lies more in the how to share the output that arises from living in a cooperative venture.

Only people that live by themselves, and provide everything for themselves completely from their own output (no buying or trading with others) are free from accepting some input of others.

In the modern world, where public security and military defense aid people even when they isolate themselves from society, there truly is no independant producer, no individuals that are not the beneficiaries of society.

The media tell me if you do not do that it is called greed.

It must be good, Obama used it to buy an election.

yes . Exactly the same as its right to pay car insurance even though you may be ultra careful and never have an accident.

If you look at anything in a child like, over simplistic way, then anything can be made to seem wrong.

According to the democrats it is. as long as the money stolen isn't theirs.

It may not be right, but it's the law.

It is, if you are a Marxist. Guess what Obama is.

No but liberals think it is

well you arent able minded so i guess that a rhetorical question