Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Would you vote Republican if...?
Just a thought my early 20's conservative friends and I had: we really couldn't care less about gay marriage, abortion, or marijuana use. What is important is the economy, because without a strong economy, none of that matters. What if a Republican ran on a platform of the following:
- legalize gay civil unions, while allowing religious organizations to decide for themselves whether they will perform them or not.
- Legalize abortions. People have the right to make their own decisions either way. At the same time religious based hospitals can choose to perform them or not.
- Legalize marijuana nationally, tax the crap out, and treat it exactly like alcohol. This would keep non-violent drug offenders out of our clogged prison system, generate new tax revenue, and cut off the major flow of cash to drug cartels. Employers can still require employees to pass drug test as jobs are a privilege, not a right. Given the stigma of pot smoking, I don't think we'd see a huge increase in use as it is already widely available.
- conservative financial & economic platform, lower tax rates, limit deductions, broaden tax base. Cut back on entitlement & defense spending. Pass balanced budget amendment.
- include line item veto amendment on all bills to cut pork barrel spending
- require congress & all other politicians to abide by the same rules & regulations that we are requires to follow. No more special retirement or healthcare programs.
I think if someone were to run on this platform, they would win by a land slide. Most people I know are economically conservative and socially liberal or apathetic. What do you think?
12 Answers
- D. ControlLv 48 years agoFavorite Answer
Congratulations! Your stated positions could be the savior of your floundering party...once they get out of their own way. However, such will be years from now - though, enough time for you expouse this as part of your future agenda as our hopeful competitors.
- Anonymous8 years ago
- First, same-sex unions are not a federal issue. For the entire history of this country, that has been handled by the states. It is a decision made by society (considering we are a self-governing people) at the more local level, not something forced upon them by a federal government. This is where you miss the point of federalism. Marriages and unions are not a federal issue, and the federal government was given no authority over the matter in the Constitution.
- Abortions are already legal. The issue is that people don't want to be forced to pay for them when the procedure is against their religious beliefs. Also, such an invasive and potentially dangerous procedure needs to be considered to require just as much parental notification and approval as a tattoo. But at the root of this issue is that it was and should be subject to state, not federal, control, as it was and had been prior to Roe v. Wade.
- I'm ok with most of these, but I don't like balanced budget amendments - it is a cowardly way to run a government, and lets every legislator off the hook for their failure to do their job.
- No line item veto. That's not a proper authority to give the president - to unilaterally modify legislation that has already been passed by our legislature.
- Yes, Congress and all government employees - elected, appointed or civil service - should have to be subject to the same laws the rest of us are.
It's a good attempt, but in trying to remove some issues from the debate, you are increasing federal government power (i.e. big government) and reducing how much self-government the people are allowed. That is the wrong direction.
- bobLv 78 years ago
no because none of what you advocate has been successful in the past. Lower taxes -- We had the lowest federal taxes in several decades under Bush. It doesn't stimulate the economy
Pass a balanced budget amendment -- most economists agree that we would be in a full blow depression right now if Obama had not passed the stimulus package.
Pork barrel spending -- that's just infrastructure money that doesn't benefit YOU.
Entitlements - another right wing talking point used to destroy a social safety net -- trust me more poverty NEVER helps an economy
Yes the Republican social issues are borderline sociopathic, but we also saw in 2008 that their economic ideas are just a bad as their social ideas.
- Anonymous5 years ago
like a previous poster pointed out, there is a percentage on both sides who will always vote straight party ticket, no matter what. personally, i think there are more like that in the GOP than among the democrats, but my perceptions could be skewed by the area where i live. going by voter registrations, republicans outnumber democrats in my county by a 5 to 1 margin. there are 4 fundmentalist churches within one block of my apartment, and i've heard their preachers delivering sermons through the loudspeakers on sunday mornings just before election day exhorting their congregation with the words "Jesus COMMANDS you to vote REPUBLICAN!" needless to say, the only democrat who holds a public office here does so only because it's required by state law that one party can not control all three commissioner seats.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- SamLv 68 years ago
That's pretty much what the new age conservatives want, I think other than the upcoming 4 years of Obama, the US has a great future as lot of the younger generations are showing they are going more conservative but with just a little more modern sympathy to those issues.
- TaiLv 78 years ago
If that's what you guys believe then you're Libertarians, not Conservatives. Libertarians (to oversimplify) are economically Conservative and socially Liberal. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I think Libertarianism makes more sense than Liberalism or Conservatism.
- 8 years ago
I don't think the government should be involved in marriage in any way. It should be a religious matter, nothing else. I am also for the legalization of all drugs, and I don't think they should be taxed. I think the government should have as little money as possible, if any.
- Anonymous8 years ago
abortions have been legal for over 40 years now
let gay people marry, why shouldn't they be miserable also
reduce public servant pay to minimum wage, if they really want to serve why let them get rich off it.
make any elected official that takes kickbacks or bribes a DP case and actually execute them.
- ?Lv 58 years ago
Yeah, I usually tend to agree more with the democratic party, but this is reasonable. I would vote for it.