How many historians disagree that George Washington was a US President?

Even the Hessians knew Washington was president. The French knew. They sent people to try to form alliances with him.

Now, the historians may have different opinions on Washingtons character or how he would react to something today. Or, like Jefferson, have differing views on his religious leanings. But there is no doubt that Washington was President.

George Washington's life is thoroughly documented including from contemperaneous documents, no-one who did the necessary research could seriously deny he was the first POTUS. Whether Jesus was God or not is essentially a matter of belief as there is no independent documentation to prove he ever did what the Bible writers claim he did.

It happened far more recently and has far more conclusive evidence that is not open to interpretation, and none of said evidence has ever been presented in anything other than a literal manner.

However, you might want to ask two historians about whether King Arthur was a real person...

That is comparing apples and oranges there. Believing George Washington is the President of the United States is not a matter of Dogma or Faith

Historians NEVER make this childish mistake of yours, confusing and existence question with an interpretation question. Read the WIDELY divergent histories of Rome

Gibbon

Augustine

Durant

Dawkins

How many historians agree on Troy being a real place?

Oh wait... you don't like people using actually equivalent examples? Not fair using actually correct reasoning?

I can play this game all day with you, but you won't ever admit to the way that you intentionally rig your "arguments" rather than making legitimate ones.

one of the favorite christian line to convince skeptics is how can you be sure that you are your parents child.

Your analogy is so laughable.