Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 5
? asked in Science & MathematicsMathematics · 8 years ago

True or False (Calculus 3 question)?

If a power series ∑a(sub k) * x^k converges at x=7 and x=8, then it converges at x= -7.

If the statement is true, tell why. If it is false, give a counterexample.

Update:

The question doesn't specify where it is centered. So the radius has a minimum of 0.5 around 7.5. I don't understand how you can assume a radius of 8.

Update 2:

Would it be valid to explain it as follows?

∑a_k * 7^x converges

a_k * 7^x is the absolute value of a_k * (-7)^k, and therefore a_k * (-7)^k converges because the converges of the absolute value implies convergence.

I feel like it's too simple of an answer and there is a flaw in it... but would that be valid?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Brian
    Lv 7
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    By the ratio test, the series converges if abs((a(k+1)/a(k)) * x) < 1, where abs

    indicates absolute value. Since it converges fro x = 8, we know that

    abs(a(k+1)/a(k)) < (1/8), and thus abs((a(k+1)/a(k))*(-7)) < 1, and so the series

    converges for x = -7.

    Edit: If the series were sum(a(k) * (x - 7.5)^k) then your concern would be valid, and

    the statement would be false. (As a counterexample look at a(k) = (-1)^k * (1.5)^k.)

    But because the series is expressed with just x^k, the midpoint of the interval

    of convergence must be 0, and hence if it converges for x = 8 it must converge

    for any x such that lxl < 8.

    Edit: I made my last edit before I saw your last edit, so now I'll respond to that.

    I don't think this works because the reason sum(a(k) * 7^k) converges might

    be because it is an alternating series, i.e., there may be a (-1)^k factor in a(k),

    in which case if we stuck in (-7)^k the series would no longer be alternating

    and so we wouldn't be able to make any conclusions about convergence

    at x = -7. This doesn't invalidate the statement but it doesn't prove it, either.

    The critical elements are that we have the term x^k in the series and that it

    converges for x = 8.

  • ted s
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    true...radius of convergence is at least 8 ;

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.