Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Politics & GovernmentGovernment · 8 years ago

what is the point of the philibuster?

it seems like a very childish tool, basically what it is saying is

"i dont like your opinion but i cant come up with a good argument against it, so im gonna be a little prick and just talk until your idea doesnt matter anymore"

this wastes governements time and the countries time, grow up congress, we voted you in to help us and work together, not to be little children focused on what you believe ignoring the country.

basically what i am saying is its a crappy way to prevent someone from trying to help the country, opinion?

Update:

my respect, i do believe that to successfully complete the act takes dedication and strength of will, to complete one, however, i guess my mindset is living in the perfect world, where you can convice people to do the right thing not lookout for themselves, it just makes sense to me that if someone can create a good point, they would recieve more votes than someone who cannot,

and i do believe the very purpose of democracy is that the majority rules, so i guess im gonna say i agree with the majority rule even if its a bad decision,

Update 2:

elizabeth, i understand what you are saying, i really do, however who is that one person that he gets to be the sole person to make a decision for a country, his view maybe deamed right by 10% or 15% of the country, but that small percent does not get to decide the fate of the other 85%, that does not seem fair to me, the whole country has the chance to vote, once legal age, and we make our decisions based on empty promises, i know this, it just seems wrong that a small percent can FORCE their opinion on the rest of the country, if that small percent could make an excellent arguement, and sway the other percent, then i would understand that is an honorable way of doing it, to simply say i know what the country wants, but no not gonna happen i think this is better, just seems wrong to me

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    *filibuster

    Rand Paul was doing something called "protesting" against the rights of the government to target and kill an American citizen on U.S. soil by domestic drone strikes. Even liberals, who are from the opposing political party, are acknowledging him for what he's done, regardless of his political views. He was standing up for our rights as U.S. citizens by trying to prevent John Brennen, who advocated this behavior, from being elected as directer of the CIA.

    Because of his beliefs, he stood speaking for 13 hours. Regardless of his political views, it's hard to argue that he's not a brave man for doing that.

    Hope this helps,

    -Elizabeth

    "and i do believe the very purpose of democracy is that the majority rules, so i guess im gonna say i agree with the majority rule even if its a bad decision,"

    I still find it unbelievable you just said that. I never thought you were smart, but in my eyes you're now the lowest of the lowest. The majority isn't always right! So why would you stick with the majority knowing that they are making bad decisions, and that the decisions they are making are not best for the country? Even YOU know what they're doing is wrong, so why would you support them?

    Plus, representative democracy is based on the idea that everyone has a right to participate in government, whether directly or indirectly. The purpose of Democracy is NOT that "Majority Rules";. that's something completely different. That rule only applies if you're in a school, and most of the kids are allergic to peanut butter so you ban it for safety purposes. It in no way has to do with the **definition** of a democracy.

    I really hate to bag on you, but you're playing the game wrong. The game isn't to follow the President like its a game of Simon Says . . . it's to gather the facts and decide for **yourself** what you think is right for this country. And the best way to win (and to help this country win) is to do this regardless of your--or the other person's--political affiliation. Even though I'm right-wing, I still have some respect for the left-wing personnel . . . I'm not going to completely disregard their ideas--whether they may be good or bad--solely for the purpose of them belonging to the opposing political party. I try to look at things with an unbiased mind, and I base my decisions accordingly.

    I hope this helps, (and I take back what I say about you being the lowest of the lowest, I was just angry)

    -Elizabeth

    Source(s): Fourteen w/ a passion for politics
  • 8 years ago

    the point of the filibuster is to preserve the rights of people who hold a minority opinion; even in a democracy, the majority is not always right

  • Usually it is used as a delaying tactic.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.