Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 7
? asked in SportsCricket · 8 years ago

With all seriousness do you agree than Shakib Al Hasan is the world's best all rounder next to Kallis?

With all seriousness do you agree than Shakib Al Hasan is the world's best all rounder next to Kallis currently?

Stats never lie. Look at Shakib's record.

Tests 28 matches 1835 runs avg-35.98... 2 hundreds.

And 102 test wickets with avg of 32.56. And 9 yes NINE 5 wicket hauls!

ODIs 126 games and 3635 runs averaging 35.63. 5 hundreds and 25 fifties.

160 wickets averaging 28.85. Economy 4.29.

Looking at those stats I am not saying they are world class but enough to rate him as the 2nd best all rounder today right?.Let's see if there is anyone better than him...

I see no one else apart from Kallis being equally good in both formats as an all rounder...

India:- Look at Yuvaraj, Jadeja or Ashwin they fall well short.

SL:- Tisara Perera's batting avg is poor while Mathews is a poor test bowler.

Pakistan:- Few rookies are there but no impressive record.

Australia:- Watson is an injury prone so not a good all rounder

England:- Stuart Broad? He also falls short

WI- Few flukes but not enough.

SA:- Currently they don't have an all rounder who is good in both formats except for Kallis who is indeed better than Shakib

NZ:- Obviously not

Isn;t this prove that Kallis is indeed better than Shakib but Shakib easily holds the 2nd place as an all rounder today.

So

#1.Kallis

#2 Shakib.

Agree?

Update:

Edit Saman sorry to disappoint you but SL ain't a fisherman's country. SL surely has far better living conditions than Pakistan. And Sri Lankans are far richer than Pakistanis to call them fisherman. Pakistan is struggling with terrorism. It's the simple truth. :-\ So your comment seems irrelevant.

Update 2:

Harmit: Indeed you seem to be right in the most part but looking at Yuvaraj's ODi record as a bowler it isn't impressive. 109 wickets in 282 games averaging almost 38! He can't be rated 2nd in ODIs mate!

I agree that Watson is up there. But apparently he will not be the same any more as he's an injury prone. But yes his up to date record is impressive thus far and ahead of Shakib.

Ashwin is not as good batsman as Shakib in ODIs. That's where he falls short.

Update 3:

And Harmit Vittory falls short as a ODI batsman. He averages just 17.

What I meant by a good all rounder is who equally does well maintaining good averages in both formats with both bat and the ball. Apart from Kallis and Shakib most of the others are not good at all 4 aspects. (1.Test batting 2.Test bowling 3.ODi batting 4.ODi bowling)

Watson is right up there I must admit. But all the others you mentioned has fallen short in some aspect.

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Stats tell something but not everything! Shakib's performances came mainly against minnows! Even you know the fact that world class teams are averse to playing with minnow teams like Bangladesh!

    Thus, Shakib was never completely rivalled by 'quality players'!

    Yuvraj Singh -

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/usa/content/player/360...

    Ashwin -

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/usa/content/player/264...

    Jadeja is just showing some sheen on turning wickets! His batting still remains a worry!

    Comparing Thisara Perera and Angelo Mathews with the other all rounders wont be prudent for the same reasons you mentioned!

    Personally, i would rate Daniel Vettori higher than Shakib! Ican bet that if Shakib plays more against the 'giants' of world cricket, he would be trampled over mercilessly! Especially the Asian ones namely India, Sri Lanka and Pakistan as they are too accustomed to playing to spin bowling! Lol! Even mystery guys like Narine, Mendis or Ajmal find it difficult to reign in the subcontinent! Greats like Warne were pulverized in the subcontinent! Thus, Shakib's success in the SC would be very short lived! Outside the SC, there wont be pitches to aid Shakib and he would become the guinea pig! All this, IF and only IF he plays against other 'giants' of the game! Scoring big and scalping fivers against minnows wouldn't really be awe striking! As for Yuvi, yeah! He isn't a good bowler in the tests but in the ODIs, he has been tried very scantily, thus tagging him as a part timer, which is not true! Trust me, I have observed his game and he looks inconspicuously deceptive enough to snare the batter! He has made most of his chances in the ODIs! Moroever, the Indian mentality is that when a bowler fails to get his rhythm, get him out of the attack (acceptable) but he is brought back veryyy late, thus destroying his morale! Yuvi has been an unfortunate victim of it as he was never given ample opportunity when he failed! But when he performed in WC 2011, you know what happened!

    Daniel Vettori -

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/usa/content/player/387...

    Shane Watson is injury prone, all right! But he is, by a huge margin, the best all rounder of these after Kallis!

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/usa/content/player/818...

    No denying the fact that he is much better than Shakib or any other all rounder in today's era after Kallis! His 'injury prone' charscter has been aggravated by the CA when they decided to play him as a pure batsman instead of an all rounder! That set the fire going!

    So, the final verdict from my side is that there are a few players around like Watson and Vettori who have done it before and Ashwin who have the capability to do it in the future! Yuvi is also a very handy all rounder! So, there is stiff competition all around! Its nt so easy to pick one and place them as the queen bee!

    IMO, the list for tests should be as -

    #1 Kallis

    #2 Vettori

    And the list of ODIs should be as -

    #1 Kallis

    #2 Yuvraj

    Shakib is a talented player but his talents could have been refurbished and groomed if he was under proactive coaches and a healthy cricket board! No issues with Bangladesh' cricket board but Shakib could have been in a better environment if not for his Bangladeshi origin! Somewhere deep down, a true cricket fan feels for waste of talent! Again, not exactly 'waste', but it could have been better!

    Anyway, placing Shakib at #2 is the work of an imbecile!

    Edit : @Dinith -

    Watto is injury prone or has he been sculpted by the media in that way? Nobody can be sure of the inside but word is that the CA is reserving him for the Ashes as they don't want to go in the Ashes without the services of Watto! Imagine a depleted SL in the Ashes against a formidable English side! SL just has the services of Mathews as a veteran and there is a series before 'THE' series! Wont you, by human instincts, try and conserve Mathews for the bigger battle? That's what the CA proposes to do! Injury or no injury, Watto IS the best among the lot!

    If you have a brand new currency note of X value, its value will be X! If its crumpled and soaked in sh!t, it still is of X value! That's what is the case with Watto! (Ignore the note jibe! :p)

    Source(s): Ashwin isnt strongly built (Gayle), not a quick runner (Dhoni, Kohli), innovative (AB) or a stroke maker! (Raina, Chandimal) He is just a normal guy who wants to thrive on the conditions by bowling or batting! His determination is his biggest weapon in his arsenal and for that to bloom, it takes a little time! I am not saying that he will do a Botham or Sobers but he is a decent all rounder in his own count! As for Vettori, he bats at no.7 or so and Shakib at 3 or 4! Vettori is forced to use the long handle towards the end and he ends up losing his wicket! His test batting record is pretty good as he doesn't have any pressure on him to score quickly! And moroever, Shakib has mainly played against minnows! Scoring runs and getting wickets against them isnt really too praiseworthy! I am just saying that there are better all rounder than Shakib in tests and in ODIs! Cheers! :)
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Shakib maybe best all rounder in rankings at the moment, but he is no where near Kallis. Kallis is compared with Gary Sobers as an all rounder. All rounder rankings change frequently depending on many factors. If you check bowling and batting rankings many times you'll wonder how did this player get in here. So to answer not at all, Shakib is well short of Kallis. And highly unlikely he will come close to Kallis.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    Good player,no doubt but second only after Kallis? It'd be easy for us if could come up with stats related to the opponents and the venues he played. The fact is, I don't rate a player unless he is effective in all conditions; the reason why Sir Jadeja is still a "sir" for me despite some very good performances in India.

  • small
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    Stats can lie if not extensive and intensive enough....... the spread and depth of data must be quite a lot before the accumulated stats can be taken very seriously..... how many test matches has Shakib played outside the subcontinent?.... I won't hurry right now to grant him even the second rank although I do rate him as one of the best upcoming all-rounders right now.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Dinith, you are absoultely right. There is no doubt that Shakib is the best all rounder after Kallis in modern day cricket. Shane Watson and Mohammad Hafeez would also be close contenders.

    :)

  • ?
    Lv 4
    8 years ago

    Shakib's record is good. But most of those performances came against Zimbabwe and Kenya. Don't think he has ever played a test match against a top team and only very few ODI's against top sides. So i don't think he's the second best. Watson,UV,Hafeez..etc better than him.

  • ?
    Lv 5
    8 years ago

    If he would have played in any other top teams , then the story would have been different , who knows he might have been called as even Legend .! But sadly he plays with the low team , this usually makes him play against other minnows .!so answer to your Qn is NO.!

    I like his Dedication towards the game , He won two consecutive Man of the series in BPL and Asia cup too.!

  • 8 years ago

    yes he has good performance on world wide cricket in the view of sense both are all rounder but everybody different like kellis start with opening batsman, medium speed bowler, other way sakib is not opening batsman and he is spinner with great fielder.

  • 4 years ago

    1

  • LION
    Lv 4
    8 years ago

    Can't agree dinith... he played most of his matches against...teams like zimbabwe so can't agree...

    @saman... another female terrorist from porkistan... what about this statement about porkistanis..."what ever you do for a terrorists he/she will remain as a terrorist" lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.