What is better TNA or WWE?

TNA because they have much better wrestlers and their matches are actually convincing. Also the fact that legends such as Hulk Hogan, Kurt Angle, Jeff Hardy left WWE to join TNA says something about the quality of WWE at the moment

Neither is "better" than the other. They are two very different types of pro wrestling.

TNA is more entertaining to me than the WWE. They have MUCH better wrestling matches. And they don't have Michael Cole, THE worst commentator in the history of the business.

If you watch Professional Wrestling to see good Wrestling Matches then TNA gives you good Singles Wrestling Matches, Good X-Division Matches, Good Tag Team Matches and Good Women's Matches. WWE has Good Singles Matches, they bury their Tag Teams, they don't have a Light Heavyweight Division and they seldom let their Women Wrestlers show their skills on television. I see better WWE Women's Matches at WWE House Shows and WWE Saturday Mornnng Slam.

In terms of WRESTLING: TNA

Entertainment: As a prefer in-ring wrestling over useless skits and segments, TNA

Both companies have their flaws though.

TNA is fighting/wrestling. WWE is entertainment.

@Vickish: Jeff had no other choice, he was a drug head. Hulk I am not sure about. 50% of TNA's past WWE superstars were drugheads.

TNA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47a7qzgecvA

What is the TNA. And WWE is fake

TNA has better wrestling WWE has a better production and backroom staff

TNA is fighting WWE is entertanment

WWE