Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Should the elderly who worked all their lives with hopes of a comfortable life in their final years get their?

health care rationed, and be forced to accept an accelerated death?

From the past:

I hate the men who would prolong their lives

By foods and drinks and charms of magic art

Perverting nature's course to keep off death

They ought, when they no longer serve the land

To quit this life, and clear the way for youth.

-Euripides 500 B.C.

7 Answers

Relevance
  • RoHo
    Lv 7
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I'm not moving over til i'm done. [Guess what you can do with your little poem]

  • S
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    You know there is a difference between living and existing. People do work for most their life and many do retire and are lucky and have money to live comfortable and stay active and travel and just one day drop dead. These are the lucky ones.Others suffer for years in poor health and on fixed incomes. Then the other extreme some may have heart attack, strokes or other serious illness that are placed in intensive care and on life support costing thousands of dollars a day? Why, when do we put a stop to artificial means of prolonging life when there is no hope. Why not just help the person with comfort measures and let nature take it's course. You are old. Not much future if any to look forward to.I would rather see the money spent to give a baby or child that has their whole life ahead of them a chance. Even if I earned the money. I don't think there could be any worse hell than being kept ''alive'' when you should of checked out.Accelerated death, Heck, I don't know perhaps that would be a blessing in disguise. Just my opinion.

  • 8 years ago

    People should get to make their own decision about this. No doctor or health plan should ever be allowed to say when its time for someone to die if that person still wants to live and the person has the financial means or insurance plan that will cover any costs that may be incurred.

    Miracles happen all the time. Some people may enter the hospital at the age of 75, seemingly with something incurable, but completely recover and live another 25 or thirty years during which they can impart lessons of long experience to the world and make it a better place.

    My mom is a three time cancer survivor and at the age of 89 brings me great joy and answers questions I have that I'd be at a loss for if she were no longer among the living.

  • 8 years ago

    Hopefully I'll have forgotten what I just read by Wednesday morning, when once again I'll be sitting next to my husband in the infusion room while he receives his bags of "magic art"~~a.k.a. chemotherapy.

    In essence he may be dying, but he still has a lot of living to do. And if the chemo makes it possible to do that for a while longer, it's his right to go for it.

    Even if he so happens to be a Senior!

    So screw Euripides from the past....and anyone from the present who happens to be like-minded.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • I amme
    Lv 6
    8 years ago

    I agree with S.

    There is a huge difference between quality of life and quantity.

    In my family (brothers, sisters, kids) we have had this discussion and we are of one opinion.

  • 8 years ago

    No. As long as I pay my own way and take care of myself, I will live comfortably.

    Source(s): Me.
  • Nora
    Lv 7
    8 years ago

    they have a right to live well and die a natural death

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.