Star Trek into Darkness is a POS. Real Trek fans chime in.?

I actually enjoyed the movie: I give it 7.5/10.

It most definitely lacked three things:

- Scientific content (Dead to sci-fi movies since Gattaca... much to my dismay)

- An original format

- A storyline of "movie proportions": what I mean by this is that indescribable leap in plot and character development that occurs when moving from TV episode to Movie.

The perspective I take with respect to this movie, which makes it enjoyable, is that it played out very much like an episode of the original Star Trek series. I genuinely felt like I was watching what would have been produced if the original Star Trek crew got together to produce a 2hour long episode with modern techniques.

Did this movie in any way measure up to my expectations of Sci-Fi? Absolutely not. It was however better than any of the Picard oriented movies of late, which were all dismal.

Yeah, it's different. But as a movie by itself it was good.

I'm just happy that it's recruiting new Trekkies. I was afraid that Enterprise killed Star Trek forever, and I'm happy to see it live on by whatever means. I'm seeing a lot of questions from budding Trekkers, wondering about older series. If it takes a bunch of shiny objects, bells & whistles to get these younger people interested, fine. I'll take it.

I just don't want Abrahms to give it the "Lost" treatment: amazing at first, then all sorts of unanswered questions that are stupidly and hastily addressed at the end. That would be terrible.

well i loved it! i thought it was great. benedict was chilling!

owns EVERY star trek series (incl. cartoon) EVERY movie...& heroes to....in which nearly every heroes actor has had some stint in one trek series or another...most notably zach quinto as heroes sylar/young spock in new star trek.

even has zachary quinto's autograph...sitting beside daniel radcliffe's autograph on my shelf!

"in hermione granger's voice when she first met ron weasley"......ummm.....& what do YOU.....have?