Since the Higgs boson (a.k.a. the God particle) has been discovered, doesn't that prove God himself exists?

As with any scientific discovery, God’s amazing creation becomes more and more impressive as we learn more about it. Either result—that the Higgs boson exists, or does not exist—represents a step forward in human knowledge and another step forward in our appreciation of God’s awe-inspiring universe. Whether or not there is a “God particle,” we know this about Christ: “For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible . . . all things were created by him and for him” (Colossians 1:16).

Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/God-particle.html#ixzz...

It would not particularly. There are theories touching directly to the beginning up of the universe that don't in specific _require_ God to get issues began, yet that's a a strategies cry from proving God would not exist. The term "God Particle" is an unlucky decision of words, because of the fact it implies some thing that in simple terms isn't there. As I comprehend it at it is maximum basic, the Higgs boson could clarify why some debris have mass, jointly as others do not. there is what's called the "properly-known kind" of particle physics. all the debris predicted by skill of the SM were in the past got here across, different than for the HB. If the HB isn't got here across, the the SM must be remodeled, and a great number of what we expect of all of us understand approximately sub-atomic debris is going out the window. If has been got here across, it might desire to bypass an prolonged way in the direction of explaining how the 4 situation-unfastened forces (gravity, electromagnetism, and the vulnerable and strong nuclear forces) went from being unified (we expect of) on the tiniest fraction of a 2nd after the universe began, to being the 4 forces all of us understand right now.

As some people on here can't quite grasp what is real or what is a story, I'll have a go.

The Higgs Boson particle has shown enough proof (so far...but will show even more in the very near future) that God did not create the Earth. I never for one moment thought he did, or thought he existed. But now, once religion has got it's head round the fact that science does in fact PROVE things, they'll come up with excuses like....'Oh yeah, there was a BIg Bang but God created it'...blah blah etc.

You can show a devout Christian as much proof as you want about Creationism and Evolution, but they still can't get it into their brainwashed heads.

Not at all. "The God Particle" was only a nickname for the Higgs-Boson. It was tentatively discovered a few weeks ago, and hasn't been much studied yet. It proves nothing, and has nothing to do with god, anyway.

"a.k.a. the God particle)"

It's not known as that. It was known as "that god-damned" particle for the difficulty they had tracking it down. They knew, theoretically, that the Higgs Bosun existed, but proving it was extremely difficult, even for a sub atomic particle.

News outlets, fearing complaints, shortened it to the "god particle".

Science does not deal with questions of god, it only deals with things that actually, or have the remotest possibility of existing. And there is zero possibility that god exists.

the term is frequently misused. the Higgs boson is just a boson, nothing to do with a god.

No,

but this may help to know about the birth of the physical realm of the universal existence.

Sometimes the absolute ignorance of some members of Yahoo is amusing, sometimes it becomes really sad...

"God particle" is only a NAME. It doesn't prove ANYTHING concerning religion.

No, it just proves that a certain someone has chosen an unfortunate nickname for this particular sub-atomic particle.

God exists! I don't need mans proof to believe that.