Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What do you think about Scotland's new tyrannical state guardian law?
every child is now going to be assigned a specific guardian to make sure he/she is not being abused by their parents
you know what this really means your going to have to make mainstream decisions about your kid
if you decide not to give him vaccines the state will steal him ( and the worst part is some of you sheeple eve agree saying things like " if a parent is stupid enough not to give his kids vaccines he would not have children" ) yeah deciding not to give your kids something packed with mercury animal DNA and formaldehyde is really stupid
other things will be affected as well. IN situations where the parent is doing what is best but the state does not like us to be awake/ self sufficient so they deem it as dangerous
Scottish people better be ready to move or make mainstream decisions with diet, medicine, discipline, spirituality, ect.
I thought Americans where the only ones with out a back bone but apparently the British let their government take away all their rights too
2 Answers
- ?Lv 48 years agoFavorite Answer
Your "question" is in dire need of a source.
Given your predilection for blindly following anti-vaccine propaganda, its safe to assume you are lying/quote mining/misrepresenting..
- Josué MLv 58 years ago
It's not much worse than parents controlling their children. Individuals should make their own decisions, not their parents, their teachers, the government, the group, the society, other people. The individual owns them self, and their body, and neither their parents not the government should make decisions in their place. All individuals own the self, and their rights cannot be taken away by either parents or the government. I suppose if someone is going to control other people, it is probably much better for the parents to have control than the government. But i don;'t believe either one should be able to. "authority" only exists to protect people from violence, and that is the only thing that the government should ever do, that's why it exists. But parents have no more right to control their children than the government does. If parents are allowed to control their children, and make any rule they want, without input from the children themselves, how is that any different from the government controlling the parents? If parents expect their children to obey them, than they parents must in turn obey the people who are in authority over them.
