Do people understand that the lower classes would pay their share if there was less income inequality?

Herein lies the problem: define the boundaries of each class. How do you decide upper, middle, and lower. I bet you 100% of the people here will consider themselves lower-middle class while making 0-$1 million+ dollars a year. Those millionaires may have to pay for all kinds of business expenses thus consider themselves middle class. Those brackets are easily worked around if you know the law or have hired people that do.

Take a look at his 1st term and what happened during the second term.. Clinton went towards the middle and congress and senate was controlled by republicans.. Jobs soared, and the economy soared due to the steps he took away from his Liberal 1st term where democrats lost control of both the senate and the congress. . You are right he soared in 2nd term BUT the reasons where not due to your interpretation. If you are going to use the facts use the correct facts.

You should earn your income not be given it because someone thinks that's the fair thing to do.

You already admitted tonight you don't pay any federal income taxes yet you complain about wealthy people not paying their fair share when they pay a helluva lot more than you do. What makes you so special that you should get a free ride in this country while you criticize people that contribute far more than you do?

Income equality. Like Communism?

Why not just have a FLAT tax... that way everyone has "skin in the game"

Income inequality is gobbledygook. If people want more money either work harder, get a better education or make a better mousetrap. LOL!

What do you mean? If we provided more welfare, those people would start to pay tax on it? LMAO

You already aren't paying income tax, what more do you want.

no we're all stupid

you're the only person with a functional brain in the whole world

"pay their share?"

if someone pays his taxes, he is paying his share

you are using suspiciously Republicanspeak