Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
12 Answers
- ?Lv 68 years agoFavorite Answer
They had observation balloons going back to the Revolutionary war. If they were launched from a barge during the Civil War, then yes they had carriers!
- Marine5Lv 78 years ago
You are obviously "Dumber Than A Box Of Rocks"...
Really should find someone to teach you how to really use a Computer...
Type in the Search Bloc: Dates of US Civil War...
Then Type in: Date of First Aircraft Carrier being Built...
Really hope you can figure it out from there ???
Source(s): Retired Marine...VSO... - AdlerLv 48 years ago
No, aircraft weren't invented yet.
However, back in the days of the Italian Renaissance Leonardo de Vinci drew drawings of some aircraft, of sorts.
It wouldn't be till 1906 that the first known airplane ( "aeroplane" as the Wright brothers called it) was invented ( or at least patented.)
- 8 years ago
Kind of, yes. As long as you're willing to be loose on the definition of aircraft (although I guess they count as "Lighter-than-Air aircraft") and "carrier".
But there were barges that deployed balloons.
Source(s): http://www.navalhistory.org/2012/08/01/the-birth-o... https://sites.google.com/site/mycwessays/air-force http://civilwartalk.com/threads/our-nation-first-a... Active-duty Navy - How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous4 years ago
I examine the solutions of all the others that responded, and together as I agree that all and sundry warfare in mans background has not been tied to grease i visit assert that considering WWI oil has been the identifying ingredient. not basically that yet i could state that if issues proceed at present day expenditures, oil could be the hot reason of wars, rather to being basically the ingredient that determines the winner of such wars. of course, it quite is simplifying issues, as all of us comprehend that there are different components in touch in why countries circulate to warfare, yet at this element and time in background, oil is the tie that binds maximum if not all of those different components. I completely disagree with the thought flex gas autos are the respond, as you will basically be paying for and advertising one flamable for yet another and could in the tip basically further entangle peoples on a regular basis lives with the genuine undertaking which isn't oil in step with say, yet potential. you're able to, in spite of assertion to the choice, decrease into international food aspects in a manner that could desire to assure warfare even speedier than oil itself ever could desire to. I agree that option could desire to be stepped forward, yet i think that the respond in the very short term is a extra useful use of present day sources till the subsequent technologies is perfected. for occasion, we desire extra useful make the main of our image voltaic, wind, hydroelectric, organic gas and nuclear potential in a manner that fairly cuts our dependence on oil be it distant places or kin.