Is it good or bad that the Southern Baptists condemned the Boy Scouts for allowing non-practicing homosexuals?

Considering that this is the same southern Baptist convention that supported slavery and opposed interracial marriage, I think it is a safe bet to say that they have been wrong on a large majority, if not all, social issues.

That said, doesn't their opposition to the boot scout rule just make you absolutely certain it WAS the right decision?It's a similar yardstick to the kkk.If the kkk supports your cause, you should have a pretty good idea that it's not a good cause.

And considering the southern Baptist convention, like the kkk, had been wrong on pretty much every issue, I think it's safe to assume they are wrong on this one as well.

(Actually, not only have these two organizations been wrong on almost every issue throughout history, they've had almost the same opinion on many of these issues, like slavery and interracial marriage. The only difference is that the southern Baptist convention realizes about 50 years after the fact that they were being stupid and apologizes, woke the kkk is, well, still the kkk)

Anyone want to make a bet? I'll bet that, in 50 years, this sane convention well be apologizing for its former stance on homosexuality like it recently apologized for its former treatment of black people.