Why do they only show the "cute" pictures of Trayvon,?

It shouldn't matter if trayvon was a thug or not, I mean really. Zimmerman is a murderer, this should not be argued. The argument is whether he had a "right" to kill him or not. Did trayvon attack Zimmerman, idk...maybe...I know many people that may become hostile if being stalked like travon was by zimmerman. Regardless, even if trayvon did attack, Zimmerman would have been beaten, not killed. Thats the difference. Zimmerman had no right to shhot trayvon. That's why he should be punished.

They DO show the "bad" ones. Otherwise, you wouldn't know they exist.

Why does it matter anyway? What matters is what actually happened during the incident. A "bad" picture does not prove Zimmerman's guilt or innocence. It only serves to emotionally sway your opinion. It deflects from the incident at hand and gets people thinking about everything and anything BUT what actually happened that night. It is a red-herring.

It's funny how you are complaining about "media bias" but ignore all the media bias against blacks. Hmmm, hypocrisy?

i don't give a damn if trayvon used goldchains, listened to awful hip hop music or was ~4/20~everyday

zimmerman is still a racist fúckhead. end of story.

Umm...the "bad" ones were all over CNN the other day. Stop playing the race card.

I am reporting your question for being racist!

Why am I getting so many thumbs down? God, people these days are so racist.