Since Barbie is anatomically imprecise, what is the difference in it or some other device for sexual usage?

Since science says that no woman exists like Barbie in the real world, it seems to be rather disingenuous to claim perversion of it through private stimulation. I deal with this as a result of personal experience in a rehabilitation facility after attaining a severe and permanent disability. The suggested use of prostitutes as one option would result in the objectification of real women with STD complications as a possibility. Those conducting the session thought it an extreme suggestion over the other one. Society has an obvious disconnect with reality. Barbie can neither feel nor reciprocate in response to being used in private stimulation. Therefore, it is illogical to deem that it is a perverted use of the doll. Other objects used as vibrators have been disguised as being regular every day products for non sexual purposes. It is ridiculous to exclude them if the use of this toy is singled out as perverted. Toys like Barbie are not considered as educational in design. They are for the pleasure of the owner whether it be child or adult. How pleasure is obtained is in the discretion of that individual. The biological sexual elements in our anatomy can be just as influenced by a vibrator or Barbie doll. The exploration of those areas with such items can create a heightened awareness of sexual satisfaction.