Why does "schizophrenia"?

... include the group of people who don't experience anything as a problem at all

... who come from families that live for a long time, and who generally experience very few problems

and who experience fewer problems with the "schizophrenic" one and only get even slightly upset when the "schizophrenic" won't do what they want them to, or when they are upset and frenetic and want the "schizophrenic" to be upset and frenetic as well (like when someone in the family is dieing or something like that). The only time that things even seem to be a problem for them is when psychiatric drugs are forced into them. So they'd probably outlive the whole family if that didn't happen, and help the people who were dieing and things like that, if the services didn't intervene at those particularly significant times. It's what they do generally anyway, resolve conflicts for people, so there aren't any problems . And "paranoid" includes the people who aren't frightened of anything at all, which is the same thing anyway. So they are the most harmless people around as well, as well as being content and positive all the time and never getting upset in any way at all (at least in terms of a degree to which anyone else would notice themselves, but are more sensitive to whether it is happening slightly momentarily and sort it out there and then).

The services claiming serious mental illness, upsets the families as well but has no effect on the "schizophrenic" except that they'd prefer the families not to be upset. And the service won't allow that to happen, and it's the family that we otherwise usually help the most because it's convenient, even though most of them don't need much help. And they've got no idea what else we do elsewhere or why, because we don't like to worry them.

Our families ending up saying things like "Everyone has problems. Everyone reacts to stress in different ways", even though in experience in reality they know that we didn't have problems and that we reacted to stress by not showing any signs of any (that everyone else who has ever known us knows as well.)

Instead of eliminating all the calm positive people with psychiatric drugs, wouldn't it by wise to leave maybe one or two around that don't have any problems at all, only solutions. That's what used to happen in former generations. And they would all have been "schizophrenics" judging by family accounts, because they sorted out seeming problems for people in ways that would be regarded as strange these days and said things that would be regarded as strange these days. And they tended to live a long time as well, which is part of what it's do with anyway.