Negotiation means both parties conceding?

From an English dictionary:

ne·go·ti·a·tion - noun, meaning 1. Discussion aimed at reaching an agreement. 2. The action or process of negotiating.

From an Arabic-English dictionary:

ne·go·ti·a·tion - noun, meaning 1. Death to Israel. 2. Death to Jews.

No.

If someone steals $100 dollars from you you should not have to negotiate anything.

The law should force the thief to give back you money, pay a fine or go to jail or pay you interest on what was stolen for the period that it was stolen.

The problem is that "the law" is the USA and it is controlled by Talmud inspired dupes.

Americans are starting to figure out who is the bad guy and in this case they do wear black hats. Some large and some very small.

The Regime better negotiate now before it is forced out of resistance.

Answer to final question yes.

Thankyou for asking such a thoughtful question. What can the Palestinians give up?

What do they have left to "give up"?

Their land? That was taken in 1948. Their rights? They don't have any under ashkenazi occupation.

Their economy? Blockaded long ago. Their children? Cast Lead and 65 years have taken more than their share.

Oh I know. They can give up the west bank and gaza and learn from the salmon how to survive in the water. Would that satisfy you?

Palestinians have already said that if they ever agree to a two state solution, it'll only be a means to an end.

The end being, of course, no more Israel.

So really, no reason to be surprised at their unwillingness to make peace.They don't want it.

A fee made by fairly numerous events in an settlement to different events, to set off off them to connect the settlement. imagine, for instance, that in the course of a team of agencies, each and every and each and every has a effective plant. They calculate that if one plant were closed and its output shifted to the something else flora, complete costs for the team must be cut back and hence complete earnings ought to upward push. If each and every and each and every corporation receives its earnings totally by advertising the output from its very own plant, no settlement must be reached, as a results of very truth the corporation whose plant closes loses all its earnings. the agencies can hence actually be induced to regulate to a plan which includes ingredient-funds, through which the agencies whose flora stay open use portion of their more desirable effective earnings to compensate the corporation whose plant closes down.

They'll probably give up some of their more unreasonable or unlikely demands, assuming that some sort of fairness is in place.

However, the Palestinian politicians seem to lack an understanding of this concept, it seems.

Spot on, this is no negotiation !! BTW, Palsetinians are right in demanding the 'right of return' and they should return to Egypt, Jordan Arabia, Iraq, Syria...

According to official Ottoman Turk census figures of 1882, in the entire Land of Israel, there were only 141,000 Muslims, both Arab and non-Arab. This number was to skyrocket to 650,000 Arabs by 1922, a 450% increase in only 40 years. By 1938 that number would become over 1 million or an 800% increase in only 56 years. Population growth was especially high in areas where Jews lived. Where did all these Arabs come from? According to the Arabs the huge increase in their numbers was due to natural childbirth. In 1944, for example, they alleged that the natural increase (births minus deaths) of Arabs in the Land of Israel was the astounding figure of 334 per 1000. That would make it roughly three times the corresponding rate for the same year of Lebanon and Syria and almost four times that of Egypt, considered amongst the highest in the world. Unlikely, to say the least. If the massive increase was not due to natural births, then were did all these Arabs come from?

All the evidence points to the neighboring Arab states of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. In 1922 the British Governor of the Sinai noted that ?illegal immigration was not only going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria.? In 1930, the British Mandate -sponsored Hope-Simpson Report noted that ?unemployment lists are being swollen by immigrants from Trans-Jordania? and ?illicit immigration through Syria and across the northern frontier of Palsetine is material.? The Arabs themselves bare witness to this trend. For example, the governor of the Syrian district of Hauran, Tewfik Bey el Hurani, admitted in 1934 that in a single period of only a few months over 30,000 Syrians from Hauran had moved to the Land of Israel. Even British Prime Minister Winston Churchill noted the Arab influx. Churchill, a veteran of the early years of the British mandate in the Land of Israel, noted in 1939 that far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied.

Palestinians can sign a peace treaty like how Egypt did after israel gave up Sinai.

That should suffice, seeing as to how land was confiscated in the very unfair Palestinian exodus tragedy.

The hope is they will give up the violence. I was fortunate to hear bibi speak in Israel. He insists that any peace agreement will result in no more missile attacks, no more bombings and no violence of any kind. Any violence will not be tolerated.

I don't think they'll give up anything at all. They want all of Israel. These "negotiations" are a farce.