Options concerning involuntary conflict and voluntary peace:?

Option 1 (mental health services):

A: Will you come with me into involuntary conflict.

B: No.

A That's not involuntary conflict. That's voluntary peace. I'm an expert. And I can't have that. I've got involuntary conflict so you have to have it as well. Voluntary means involuntary. So you've got to come with me we've got some "medication" to "help" with that. It cause involuntary conflict so it always "helps".

Option 2 (humans):

B: Will you come with me into voluntary peace.

A: Whatever

B: Suit yourself and I'll suit myself.

I find option 2 much simpler and straightforward, but what would I know. I'm not an expert. And they always know better. The specially recruited Park Management Experts, dug up all the plants that grew, and replaced them all with plants that all died, and nearly everyone was annoyed with the Park Management experts, especially the people who advised them not to do it, and had looked after all the plants and had to (they thought) dig them all up and replace them with ones that died.

But it seems to go much more smoothly when that's done with humans, because when they get messed up and die, nearly everyone agrees that there must have been something wrong with the humans and that's why everything else goes wrong with term as well, because the Human Park Management Experts say so, and that involuntary conflict and destruction are always best.

Personally, I reckon voluntary peace always gets the job done faster and more efficiently and results in more voluntary peace. (without any double-binds into involuntary conflict, or even into voluntary peace). It's like a restaurant menu where people can choose voluntary peace, or involuntary conflict, but only for themselves or the people who choose the same dish.

With peace, voluntary means voluntary. It doesn't mean the opposite. So it's easy to tell the difference between voluntary peace and involuntary conflict, from the initial menu offering, with voluntary peace meaning either free choice, and involuntary conflict meaning one choice, involuntary conflict.

Which option would people like out of the free choice human menu

Voluntary peace-> voluntary peace

Involuntary conflict->voluntary peace

Involuntary conflict->involuntary conflict

Or alternatively off the single enforced choice house menu forced by the mental health services:

Voluntary peace OR involuntary conflict (either/both)->involuntary conflict. (enforced with drugs and stuff)

I like my menu because I like voluntary peace, and I'm never compliant with the other kind of stuff. It's alright for some. There's no accounting for taste. But involuntary conflict just isn't my cup of tea, especially when there are harmful drugs involved to be forced into me anyway for a few months at a time, now and then. I still like voluntary peace better for myself, so it doesn't last. I always have relapses from involuntary conflict back into voluntary peace. And the sometimes incurable medical conditions I can usually sort out for myself. With just like a few minor medical things remaining, that some people might take seriously considering how they were caused, but I can sort those out later, and back in the swing of voluntary peace. And getting together undoing the mental health system if it can't change by itself, and needs a little help to get rid of the unnecessary involuntary conflict and force.

Mental health services menu or human menu, and which choice from those?