Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
IS THERE AN ALGEBRA PRO OUT THERE TONIGHT? SOLVE THE EQUATION PLZ?
27^(2x)=9^(x+1) THE SOLUTION IS x=
SIMPLIFY
THANKS
3 Answers
- 8 years agoFavorite Answer
27^(2x)=9^(x+1)
27 can be written as 3^3
9 can be written as 3^2
(3)^(3*2x) = 3^(2(x+1))
as bases are equal,equate the powers
6x = 2(x+1)
6x = 2x+2
4x = 2
x = 2/4
x = 1/2
- Steve CLv 68 years ago
It's probably wanting you to use logs, partial fractions or something but...
quite a lot of maths(and engineering for that matter!) is about spotting forms (but you'll probably not have been taught about them per se, because that can gets into *seriously* heavy number theory!)
...
ie looking at that I remember 27 is just a different form of 3*9 which is just a different form of 3*3*3 which is just a different form of 3^3
ie 27=3*9=3*3*3=3^3
and 9=3*3=3^2
any time you see 27 you can substitute in 3^3 as it's the exact same "value" just written in a different form/way
so I'd rewrite that equation as
(3^3)^(2x)= (3^2)^
and simplify
remembering (a^b)^c=a^(b*c)
3^((3*2)x)=3^(2*(x+1)
3^(6x)=3^(2*(x+1)
That last bit looks a bit unweildy so lets get move a"2" from the index to the base of the power on both sides...
works out as
(3^2)^(3x)=(3^2)^(x+1)
9^3x=9^(x+1)
now we have an equation of the form a^b=a^c
as a is the same on both sides b=c
as such
3x=x+1
2x=1
x=0.5
lets see if that value works
27^(2*0.5)=9^(0.5+1)
27^(1)=9^(1.5)
27=27
Yes that seems to work out
- Anonymous8 years ago
Others saw a way to simplify the problem through clever observations. But that method is of limited utility, for example suppose the problem is: 29^(2*x) = 7^(x +1). Try using their method on that.
This equation calls for logarithms and yields a general solution.
M^(2*x) = p^(x + 1)
(2*x)*ln(M) = (x + 1)*ln(P)
(2*x)*ln(M) = x*ln(P) + ln(P)
(2*x)*ln(M) - x*ln(P) = ln(P)
x*[2*ln(M) - ln(P)] = ln(P)
x = ln(P)/[2*ln(M) - ln(P)]..... general solution
if;
M = 27
P = 9
x = ln(9)/[2*ln(27) - ln*(9)]
x = 2.197225/[2*3.295837 - 2.197225]
x = 2.197225/[6.591774 - 2.197255]
x = 2.197225/4.394449
x = 0.5000000 .............................. Answer
Oh, and the other equation I proposed above:
M = 29
P = 7
x = ln(7)/[2*ln(29) - ln(7)]
x = 0.406365
Much easier using logarithms, you don't have to use clever observations.
The equation I derived is the general solution.