Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

IS THERE AN ALGEBRA PRO OUT THERE TONIGHT? SOLVE THE EQUATION PLZ?

27^(2x)=9^(x+1) THE SOLUTION IS x=

SIMPLIFY

Update:

THANKS

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    27^(2x)=9^(x+1)

    27 can be written as 3^3

    9 can be written as 3^2

    (3)^(3*2x) = 3^(2(x+1))

    as bases are equal,equate the powers

    6x = 2(x+1)

    6x = 2x+2

    4x = 2

    x = 2/4

    x = 1/2

  • 8 years ago

    It's probably wanting you to use logs, partial fractions or something but...

    quite a lot of maths(and engineering for that matter!) is about spotting forms (but you'll probably not have been taught about them per se, because that can gets into *seriously* heavy number theory!)

    ...

    ie looking at that I remember 27 is just a different form of 3*9 which is just a different form of 3*3*3 which is just a different form of 3^3

    ie 27=3*9=3*3*3=3^3

    and 9=3*3=3^2

    any time you see 27 you can substitute in 3^3 as it's the exact same "value" just written in a different form/way

    so I'd rewrite that equation as

    (3^3)^(2x)= (3^2)^

    and simplify

    remembering (a^b)^c=a^(b*c)

    3^((3*2)x)=3^(2*(x+1)

    3^(6x)=3^(2*(x+1)

    That last bit looks a bit unweildy so lets get move a"2" from the index to the base of the power on both sides...

    works out as

    (3^2)^(3x)=(3^2)^(x+1)

    9^3x=9^(x+1)

    now we have an equation of the form a^b=a^c

    as a is the same on both sides b=c

    as such

    3x=x+1

    2x=1

    x=0.5

    lets see if that value works

    27^(2*0.5)=9^(0.5+1)

    27^(1)=9^(1.5)

    27=27

    Yes that seems to work out

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Others saw a way to simplify the problem through clever observations. But that method is of limited utility, for example suppose the problem is: 29^(2*x) = 7^(x +1). Try using their method on that.

    This equation calls for logarithms and yields a general solution.

    M^(2*x) = p^(x + 1)

    (2*x)*ln(M) = (x + 1)*ln(P)

    (2*x)*ln(M) = x*ln(P) + ln(P)

    (2*x)*ln(M) - x*ln(P) = ln(P)

    x*[2*ln(M) - ln(P)] = ln(P)

    x = ln(P)/[2*ln(M) - ln(P)]..... general solution

    if;

    M = 27

    P = 9

    x = ln(9)/[2*ln(27) - ln*(9)]

    x = 2.197225/[2*3.295837 - 2.197225]

    x = 2.197225/[6.591774 - 2.197255]

    x = 2.197225/4.394449

    x = 0.5000000 .............................. Answer

    Oh, and the other equation I proposed above:

    M = 29

    P = 7

    x = ln(7)/[2*ln(29) - ln(7)]

    x = 0.406365

    Much easier using logarithms, you don't have to use clever observations.

    The equation I derived is the general solution.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.