Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Are indoctrination and belief really appropriate for children?
Often we hear that some religious parents indoctrinate because they want the best for their kids, "after all, you teach a kid not to cross the street don't you?"
But we do NOT, in fact, teach children not to cross streets, we simply teach them to cross streets safely. Religions teach children to fear the consequences of questioning and disbelief, they way you can teach children to fear the street. But religions end there, unlike their street-crossing analogy. If a child is taught to believe without question, are they not being made vulnerable to manipulative and charismatic people that claim divine revelation?
Let's take a Christian child for example. Assuming for the moment that the Christian view is true, isn't teaching a child to believe and accept God's wisdom without question simply making that child vulnerable to abuse? Satan, claiming to be God might tell the child to murder her parents, or when he's a man, to murder his son. Nefarious people claiming to be pastors could convince that child to drink poison in the name of belief, or wage war.
Isn't teaching religion from an early age making a child MORE vulnerable to harm rather than helping keep the child safe? How could indoctrination and belief help the child?
9 Answers
- c3pnisLv 68 years agoFavorite Answer
Indoctrination to religion will only set the child at a disadvantage in today's growing, competitive society.
Lawrence Krauss explains it better than I can:
- James KLv 78 years ago
I find it noteworthy that science is the same the world over, but religion is largely a facet of geography.
Thus, (any) religion by its very lack of universal acceptance (though an argumentum vox popularum is not a strong argument) is in fact a strike against them.
In that vein, unless they are shown to be substantiated (with evidence) they are no more "real" than the legend of Gilgamesh, or Thor, or leprechauns. To teach a child (who automatically accepts as true what authorities like parents tell them) things and call the true when they are not so proven is to do the child a disservice, cripple critical thinking, and close his mind to what is really known to be true or can be discovered.
- ?Lv 78 years ago
In human culture, religion has always been a foundation of family and community.
We sit on a unique period in history here, when it's considered 'indoctrination' to teach your kids about your world view and most deeply held beliefs on what is sacred.
I am soooo curious-- how do you raise a child at arm's length, never really sharing with them what you believe, who you are, never really allowing them to be part of the community/family with rites of passage and tradition?
I don't know if you're aware, but in developmental psychology, things like identification and modeling are all part of child development. To raise a child while not sharing the norms, values, customs, traditions, etc. of the family or community could do some serious damage.
I worry about the implications for those children who are raised to some level estranged and isolated.
For example, look at some of the tribal cultures in Africa that tattoo children on the face at different stages of their life-- it's like a rite of passage. People accuse them of a barbaric practice, but in fact sociologists found that without being permitted to take part in the tradition, the children (as well as the tribe) grow apart, the children never quite find their place in the tribe and the tribe never quite treats them as one of the same.
So while the tattoos may seem barbaric to outsiders, it's even more barbaric to deprive the children of that sense of belonging.
It's easy for an atheist to raise their kids with their own norms, values, traditions, customs, etc. without bringing religion into it-- atheists don't have those beliefs. So the child is not being raised semi-estranged, but but being brought right into the fold.
But I don't understand how religious parents could undertake that kind of challenge-- raising your children while keeping some of the major components of human family relationships completely absent.
Those poor kids would be like lab rats-- maybe worse; like those poor monkeys who they took their mother away and replaced it with a cold, metal sculpture that had a nipple and feeding tube fed through it.
- ?Lv 78 years ago
n·doc·tri·nate (n-dktr-nt)
1. To instruct in a body of doctrine or principles.
2. To imbue with a partisan or ideological point of view
It is impossible to raise a child without indoctrinating the values of the parent or society they're being raised in, but I do agree that children should be taught to question belief systems, as long as they're not questioning just to be contrary.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 8 years ago
I'd say no. If a child ever asked me if a God or heaven existed, it wouldn't be right to say it did or it didn't.
The most proper way to answer that would be, "There's a lot of possibilities. Some people think it exists, some don't. It's up to YOU to decide by examining the world around you."
- Anonymous8 years ago
You are right that religion should never be taught to children. I see it as child abuse and should not be allowed. This is the 21st century and teaching children middle ages belief's to scare them into believing or they'll die in hell is sick. it takes a sick person to teach children about so much hate and contempt that their bible has in it.
- ?Lv 68 years ago
To get a child to believe in something uncritically (aka indoctrination) is never a good idea. It's sad that not very many people value critical thinking.
- Anonymous8 years ago
Dunno here at south america Parenting is mostly all about letting them play sports and recently video games 24/7 and occasional interrupt them for going to eat or do their homework.and telling them the occasional tip/hint.
Now dont think those are the most liberal or rare cases, since,actually, in the most rare cases they are just left totally to their "own discretion" and they adapt to be very responsible in their own.
Also today there is internet, l think that teaching them how to use it properly, that is surfing it and getting no virus or privacy infriction by facebook would be a valuable information. =)