If Syrian Rebels......?

It should.

But it won't.

Obama wants a regime change....although he says he does not.

So as he rarely speaks honestly his denial of his intentions indicates exactly what he wants.

Obama wants to support the muslim brotherhood ( again) and we all know how well that worked out in Egypt......burning churches and dead Christians are the results.

Obama doesn't seem to have heard about the dead Christians and burning churches......or just does not care.

Yes, it would.

"Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme 'approved by Washington' is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people."

Yes actually the rebels are responsible and that is why the UN is being rushed.

The Obama terrorist supporters needed UK approval for their genocide but now

the usa will impeach Obama then go after the terrorists.

In other words they will restart the war on terrorists.

Just a USA merry go round of total destruction of our continent!

Look here, they're already planning to switch sides again:

http://rt.com/usa/syria-assad-morell-qaeda-192/

No, why? just because, actually i would like to see how they're gonna weasel their way out of this if it does turn out the rebels were the perpetrators, its OK for Obama but Cameron wont be able to hide his red face, in fact he may have to resign :0

As usual, nothing will be proven as to who actually used them. I don't think it is too difficult to produce a chemical weapon and GB and the rest has enough to kill us all. Amen.