Why didnt THE U.S attack or even propose attacking Israel for its use of Chemical Weapons on GAZA?

Because Israel are good. They are democratic. Gods chosen people. They give candy to kids and are kind to animals. And the suns shines out their ***.

For the same reason that the US disregarded a UN report earlier in the year which suggested that rebels had carried out a chemical weapons attack in Syria: it doesn't suit the narrative. http://www.policymic.com/articles/61295/media-tell...

The Turks used them on Kurds as recently as 2010, and there wasn't a peep out of the U.S.

The despotic U.S. administration seeks a justification to sell to the public in order to manufacture consent. It hasn't worked.

The administration doesn't give a damn about "human rights" or chemical weapons, they just want political consent to knock down another domino on their way toward achieveing the geopolitical goals of Zbiginew Brzezinski.

White Phosphorous is NOT a chemical weapon

Chemical weapons react with the chemistry of humans to do harm on a systemic level.

White Phosphorous is just fire

(and the US uses it too.)

Yep the US supports the use of Chemical weapons if used by a ally but not if used by someone else.

Also....guess who gave them those weapons to...

America should bomb itself using Obama "calculus", it not only uses white phosphorus, but it also has and uses Napalm, cluster bombs, incendiary devices, and depleted uranium.

americans are too much in the tank for israel to hold israel accountable for anything

Because we have better sense.