In capitalism, people can be (have been) sacrificed for the sake of capitalism. In communism,?

Your rating their goodness or quality based on the amount of victims that have consequently died in investment to their economic modality. There are other causes other than what theory of economics is being implemented, causing more causalities.

If that is your criteria, than the conclusion can be reached only in perception of a the toll of sacrifice in mathematical formulation. From my own grazing on the numbers, I am certain that communist countries have had more die proportional to their total citizens.

Communism doesn't kill by itself. Some times it is certain rules of communism. These rules, that are used as methods, can fail to achieve need-fulfillment or perhaps reduce crime, illness, and war.

You might also judge the quality of an economy by the number of people thriving rather than the number sacrificing with their lives?

I am not much of an economist. I don't venture into semi-communist worlds for exploration of their finances, quality of their infrastructures, or the say...treatment of their sick, or anything else of a similar nature.

They all offer different degrees of individual opportunity and freedom. The empirical evidence is obvious of why system offers the most. Poor people in capitalism are far better off than the poor in communism or socialism. Capitalism is not perfect, but there isn't a better system that allows poor people to become wealthy within one generation. At their core, even socialist and communist governments are capitalistic.

None are there is another way but those who control the nations will not allow it Check out Social Credit a theory which states "Man is the master of money not its slave "

Islamism, catholicism, christianism, buddhism, sims 2. All of them do the same.

Sims is the best cuz u have lots of fun.