Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Superstrike vs Rodrigues ruling Should I Create a longer ast agreement to avoid confusion with the tds law?

There was a recent ruling where a landlord fell foul of confusing rules regarding the tenancy deposit protection scheme because technically a new tenancy was formed every month after the initial tenancy period ended.

In order to protect myself from this kind of rubbish instead of creating a tenancy for 6 months, should I do it say for 2 years, with break clauses ?

Or could this give me problems for some other reason ?

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Superstrike Vs Rodrigues did not decide that a new tenancy is created every month after a fixed term ends.

    It confirmed that a new tenancy is created on the expiry of a fixed term, but that tenancy stays in effect until a new fixed term tenancy is created. This has always been the case.

    The advice given by all 3 deposit schemes is to issue new 'prescribed information' at the start of the new periodic tenancy. At present, all 3 schemes continue to protect the deposit when the tenancy transfers form the original to a 'statutory periodic tenancy' but there is a suspicion that TDS and My|Deposits may introduce fees for this. If that happens, you will be advised.

    Many BTL mortgages do not allow tenancy agreements longer than 12 months.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.