Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why don't most car makers offer the same rear axle gear ratio options for the auto vs the manual trans?

I own a 2012 Mustang V6 auto. It's a great car, but the stock 2.73:1 gears are too high and they're more geared toward gas mileage and freeway driving vs a balance of economy and performance. I could have ordered 3.31:1 gears, as a stand alone option, but I did not want to order the car and wait for weeks for it to be shipped in, just for a the gear option.

Ford offered the GT Mustang with either the stock 3.15 or the optional 3.55 or 3.73 gears. As far as I know, there were no gear options for GT autos, only for manuals and as I stated, the V6 could be optioned with 3.31 gears, with either trans.

I did some research and it seems that many, if not most car manufacturers either don't offer gear option for the auto trans at all or they offer only slightly lower gears. But, for the manual trans, not only do they come standard with lower gears, but some car makers offer even lower gear options for their manual transmissions

So, my question is this: Why are such low gears offered as options on most manual cars, but not for the autos? Obviously, it can't be because the manufacturers assume auto buyers are less concerned with performance. Otherwise why would Dodge even offer 470HP SRT Charger and Challengers with auto transmissions? And why would Chevy offer the auto trans on the SS and ZL1 Camaros? And why wouldn't they offer performance gears on these car that are very obviously performance cars, regardless of the which trans they have? The same can be said about the GT Mustang There has to be a technical/mechanical explanation vs a marketing reason.

1 Answer

Relevance
  • Dan
    Lv 4
    7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    In this case, past performance is indicative of future performance. It turns out that not many people who order automatic transmissions are really that interested in different axle ratios. This is unfortunate for the minority of buyers who actually are, but the numbers are so small, the manufacturers would lose large amounts of money just to equip those small numbers to suit these buyers. So it turns out, this has an advantage for the car makers. Since the automatics are usually equipped with a higher ratio rear gear, the CAFE or corporate average fuel economy goes up a bit, since there is a bit of fuel savings with the higher ratios.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.