Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 7
? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 7 years ago

In 2013 Obama set another new record for the # of Americans in poverty. Is this change we can believe in?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Ciph
    Lv 6
    7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2489892/Re...

    "The new measure is aimed at providing a fuller picture of poverty, but does not replace the official government numbers. Put in place two years ago by the Obama administration, it generally is considered more reliable by social scientists because it factors in living expenses as well as the effects of government aid, such as food stamps and tax credits."

    Hey dumbass - Obama changed the formula for calculating the poverty levels, and under Obama's new formula, levels are higher. The "official" figures use the Bush-era poverty formula, and those figures are unchanged.

    Basically, the new measure changes the definition of poverty, so it cannot be directly compared to the standard formula.

  • Ray S
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Actually, the new record for the number of Americans in poverty set in 2013 is the fault of The Do Nothing Congress resulting from the affect of the obstructionist Republican Party of NO!

  • ?
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    You really have no idea what you are talking about. You're parroting sound bites from the right wing media without bothering to try and understand the basis for such claims. The conservative echo chamber counts on their audience not bothering to think. And what is really ludicrous is when the 'studies' that are being quoted come from the Heritage Foundation. These are the same people whose predictions of the cost of the ACA even Grover Norquist thought were ridiculous.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    I wonder when liberals will finally start holding Obama accountable for the state of the union, seeing as how we're starting his 6th year in office.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 7 years ago

    obama is only not responsible for the america s present situation but Bush senior and bush junior and usa policy makers are responsible for present situation as well because of the involvement in iraq and afghanistan war.

  • moose
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Sadly we can believe it, but not believe IN it. All we can do is hope our politicians get their heads on straight and change course soon.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Closer, ever closer to the liberal Utopia...

    100 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON THE GOVERNMENT FOR THEIR VERY EXISTENCE

    What could possibly go wrong...

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    People better believe in it because it will continue.

    Source(s): "YO YO YO"
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.