Will any want to challenge The Apostle James the Greater in the next Evolution/Creationism debate. Chickens?

That would be a pointless exercise. There is nothing to debate, evolution happened and continues to happen. Creation (as long as it involves evolution) could potentially have happened but there is absolutely no evidence in support of this idea.

Besides, if you are talking about a typical speaking debate format, no scientific subject can be properly debated in that way. Feel free to admit that creationism is not science if you like, but evolution most definitely is scientific and therefore the format is not appropriate (that is why scientific issues are 'debated' via publication of papers in peer reviewed scientific literature).

If God is not real then why all the hostility against Him. All this ranting and raving tells me there must be something to this God thing. Romans 1:21

Have you ever seen a chicken without its feathers? You know shaven? Just bare skin? It kind of looks like a Dinosaur. Oops I ment an artists depiction of a Dinosaur only birds have stupid beaks.

You couldn't win a debate with me if I was asleep.

You are a liar...and not smart enough to be included in your own debate.

We don't need to debate evolution over your COMPLETELY STUPID creationism idea.

No. There is no "debate" on this topic.

Creationism is provably and demonstrably wrong.

Would you want to debate whether 2 + 2 = 4?

Would you want to debate whether water is wet?

Guess not.

Pretty classic faithless answers..............they only have logical fallacies and ridicule to offer.

When you got nothing go for the insults - atheist dogma.

Nope. Bill Nye proved that God is make believe.

What came first?