Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What would be a worse way to die in space?

So I was thinking about the movie Gravity (and also some other cheese-ball sci-fi movie I saw called Europa Report). Both movies feature a scene in which a character is thrown of into space without a tether, and only limited oxygen remaining, with virtually no chance of a rescue.

In this situation, the person in the suit, knowing that death was inevitable, would have two choices:

1. Open your helmet to space and die quickly.

2. Allow your suit to run out of oxygen and die more slowly.

Now, it might seem that the faster death would be preferable, but you'd be conscious the entire time. Explosive decompression of your body, however fast, seems like a terribly painful, messy way to go out. I would think you'd be conscious and the entire time your organs are trying to escape your body through your eye-sockets.

On the other hand, what would happen to you body as your run out of oxygen and begin breathing in more carbon dioxide? I would imagine you'd eventually lapse into unconsciousness, and finally die while you're passed out. Probably wouldn't feel a thing, right? Seems like that'd be preferable, assuming I have the biology right.

Can any Bio or Astronomy majors confirm any of this? Am I missing something or do I have this right?

Update:

gotcha and Paul are hitting on a point that I missed: that dying from CO2 poisoning isn't the same as dying from oxygen deprivation. Good catch, guys.

So the follow-up question would be: If you're in a space-suit, and you run out of oxygen, do they typically have sufficient CO2 scrubbing capability to allow for you to run out of oxygen without poisoning you with CO2? Or is CO2 poisoning a foregone conclusion once a garden-variety space-suit has used up all its oxygen? In other words, if your suit runs out of oxygen, but is otherwise functioning normally, is it the oxygen deprivation that gets you, or the CO2?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Paul
    Lv 7
    7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Your problem is how you die.

    Dying of oxygen starvation is painless, you simply grow tired, fall asleep lapse into a coma and don't wake up. O2 levels need to drop below 4% for you to lapse into unconsciousness.

    Dying of CO2 poisoning on the other hand is very painful and unpleasant and if you want to know what it feels like try holding your breath. You're wide awake and panicking, it's a lot like drowning or suffocating or choking. It's probably the scariest way to die.

    If my CO2 scrubbers were working fine I'd take the slowly drifting off to sleep O2 starvation. If my CO2 scrubbers weren't working I think it's a Sophie's choice between two equally painful ways to die.

  • 7 years ago

    You are essentially correct, at least with the physical realities... Consider the mental aspect though - you may have 8 to 10 hours of oxygen available; that's an *awfully* long time to be alone in space, waiting for the end.

    Personally... I think the quick, 30-45 second death may be the way to go... sure, it's going to hurt for a few seconds, but you'll go into shock quickly, and lose consciousness - a far nicer death than from some of those I've seen...

    And, you should know - it's not all that easy for an astronaut to 'open' his/her suit on their own.... They might *have* to wait for the oxygen to run out.

  • John W
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    You could shut off the CO2 absorber and just pass out. In the 50's, sci-fi stories included a cyanide pill. I always thought it would be a great time to try out Na2S, the analog to hydrogen sulfide that was hoped to induce hibernation or 5'-AMP or DADLE all believed to induce hibernation in mammals, perhaps all of them at once. Might as well record some useful data on the way out.

    If you've ever had Congestive Heart Failure, you would know that O2 deprivation is not drifting off to sleep, it's panic breathing. Try having low O2 for real, I have, not fun.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    I believe you are right , when oxygen supply to the brain is gradually reduced , you will slowly die . It is called Cerebral Hypoxia . There are various side effects but essentially you will slowly lose brain functions and die .

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    The death by loss of your O2 supply would be agony. You wouldn't just get sleepy and then drift off. Your first scenario, while messy looking to someone else, probably would be better for you in that it would be very quick.

  • 7 years ago

    The quality of death is the pain that one must undergo to die and not what happens after. So choose your criterion accordingly.

  • 7 years ago

    I think it would be to let your oxygen supply run out. Think about it your up in space and you know you'll never see your family again and thinking about that it like torture to know your dying all alone up in space

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.