i know people on here are always looking for evidence for god?

"...underwater archaeologist thinks he has found proof..."

Notice he *thinks* he has, not that he has.

"He is on a marine archeological mission that might support the story of Noah."

That "might." It hasn't yet, and might not ever.

"According to a controversial theory proposed by two Columbia University scientists, there really was one in the Black Sea region."

Black Sea region. Not worldwide.

"By carbon dating shells found along the shoreline, Ballard said he believes they have established a timeline for that catastrophic event, which he estimates happened around 5,000 BC."

That would be 7,000 years ago, about 1,000 years before YECs claim the earth existed. Oops.

No, that won't help. There's no evidence there of "Noah's flood." There isn't even evidence yet of a Black Sea flood, which while plausible, wouldn't be "Noah's flood."

You guys really don't get what "evidence" is, do you?

No. Even if there was a flood, that doesn't mean that it was caused by a supernatural agent.

Also, did you read your own article? The flood they're talking about was regional and limited to the shores of the Black Sea. This is nowhere near the location nor scope of the flood in Genesis. This story implies that there may have been an actual flood on which the story was based, but that's it. Just because there really was an Abraham Lincoln does not mean "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" is biographical.

ROFL, that is not evidence for god. The word "god" isn't even mentioned anywhere in the article. It just states finding underwater cities & evidence for floods from melting glacers, and everyone already knew that.

Nope.

I've seen ark wreckage in mountains, sorry no link remembered.

That is weak compared.

The floods are here, sea levels are rising, climate chaos more obvious, every global year. . .

Human, blaming god is a lack of responsibility issue.

That isn't evidence, that is a researcher saying here is what I'm going to be looking for. He hasn't found anything.

You didn't actually read the article, did you? If you had, you'd know it wasn't.

well so much for 'the just shall live by faith'