serious question: are countries with population decline more likely to experience revolution or war?

Throughout history, in the midst of war, and there is generally war(s) going on. Caused by the unequalness, and a separation of class. What you will see is a play upon the population in gaining an advantage, and what I notice about that is the decline, by means of b/c, and/or abortions, but also the increase, more so, in the ways of thinks being done artificially. Because, it isn't uncommon in history for one to want to sire as many as possible to build a dynasty, while trying to keep another on 'friendly' terms.

It is always better to let nature run it's course, and keeping things even throughout the world with regard to population. Hopefully, we will have that someday. The sooner the better.

Low population growth is usually because women of the country have decided not to have babies. It may or may not be a product of state policies that encourage motherhood or discourage it.

Revolutions are more likely to happen when there are a lot of young people to push for it so my guess is low population growth would have the opposite effect. What is happening in the Ukraine is more like sabre rattling of a potential civil war between those that are loyal to Russia those that want new links with the west.

My guess is that the reason women in Japan have only one or two kids is that housing prices are so high, and apartments are so small, there really is no room for more kids.

Serious question: are countries with population decline more likely to experience revolution or war?

* No, not necessarily.

Puerto Rico is an USA organized and non incorporated territory, many are relocating to USA seeking a better quality life due to economic problems. Although a small minority is seeking independence of PR, peacefull means are used, not revolution or violence.

War at PR? I do not see any country wanting to attack Puerto Rico since it would be attacking USA.

It depends on the reasons for population decline. If the decline is due to war, epidemics or other calamities the country is ripe for takeover by foreign governments or by different faction of its own government. If, however, the decline is the result of most citizens to have fewer children in order maintain sustainability, the results can be very good.

One telltale is the migration rate (immigrants/emigrants)--although that does not always pan out. JAPAN: Total Fertility Rate=1.4; deaths exceed births by 2 per 1000; immigrants outnumber emigrants by only 1 per thousand--Japan is relatively safe. GERMANY: Total Fertility Rate=1.4; deaths exceed births by 3 per thousand; immigrants outnumber emigrants by 5 per thousand--Germany needs to be careful.

A couple of countries to keep an eye on. THAILAND: Total Fertility Rate=1.6; births now exceed deaths by 4 per 1000 but this should reverse by 2030; immigrants outnumber emigrants by ZERO.

Thailand could become a powerhouse if it is mindful of its economic policies. UNITED STATES: Total Fertility Rate 1.9; births now outnumber deaths by 5 per thousand but this is due somewhat to a huge base population. Immigration rate is 2 per thousand. IF the U.S. reduces the Total Fertility Rate to 1.5 and curtails immigration slightly--while conserving resources--it could survive as a so-called "major power" well into the 22nd Century, and beyond.

The UK Is ruled by a handful of posh boys. They seriously underestimate the heart and fighting spirit of of the every day peasant.

Muslims THINK they will rule our lands, because they're going by UK laws. They have no idea...no matter what the government says, we will rip them limb from limb and laugh while we're doing it.

Our government says one thing. The people say another. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HANT2802BuM&list=U...

Interesting question. My guess would be that if the country is experiencing the decline because of shortages of land, food, etc,…then the answer would be "yes".