Why is electronic music such bad charters in U.S. compared to Europe?

It's because the charts in the U.S, along with radio in the U.S, just have crap music all together.

You are right.

The charts are dominated by mindless, generic pop music about partying, dancing, getting drunk, doing drugs, having sex, etc.

Or garbage "rap" music.

Rock is okay but even it can't get its way in there.

All the weird indie rock for the hipsters and trend followers dominates the chart.

No real rock. Just rubbish like Arctic Monkeys and Fallout Boy.

Avicii has great music. Calvin Harris as well. Deadmau5, Afrojack, etc.

The highest Deadmau5 got was number 100 on a top 100 best new hits chart. Yep...

But David Guetta and his mindless pop collaborations are about as far as our talented electronic music producers are going to get in the charts.

It's bad charters because the U.S has to bastardize its music to please itself.

It cannot take European music and love it, it has to take European music, turn it into crap and then they love it.

Dubstep for example dominated the charts in 2011 only after American producers like Skrillex and DATSIK killed the original genre and turned it into what it is today.

All European music is beautiful, electronic and non-electronic.

Blame the American Music Industry. They have to ruin European music just to like it.

What is popular and what is not in electronic music remains quite divided. Certain genres of electronic music such as electropop, electro house, and brostep are big charters because they are marketable to the young masses just as pop music is. Billboard has its own Hot Dance/Electronic Songs Chart for electronic pop rubbish. People such as Calvin Harris, Avicii, and David Guetta are consistently present on the pop charts. Heck, even Skrillex who is a RIAA-signed producer, won a Grammy for his brand of bathroom humor known as "brostep music". Tiesto and Armin Van Buuren are nothing to gleam over because they were dogs who had their day in the sun during the 2000s, but are now just guys who are told what to play and what to put in their music...literally just "followers" of hype now.

The other unpopular, non-mainstream rest of electronic music remains so, because it is just too complicated and unwieldy for corporate jerk companies to tame. Such examples are Goa trance, progressive psytrance, and psybient; will never be easy to exploit. That other "half" of electronic music should remain rightfully vibrant and expressively free. Why? Who wants generic gimmicks, corny singing, and skanky dancers in it? There is already enough of that in pop music already.

Because the US charts are owned by corporations who are too greedy to expose people to good music.

I heard enough of it in The Netherlands, it's nothing special.