Believer challenge?

Nothing doesn't explode. I feel like that's enough unless you want more. If you do......just say so. I'm gonna have fun with you.

Nature, or the Universe, has laws. There are higher laws and lower ones, yet all work in unison perfectly. Because there are laws that are set, there has to be a 'something' that is greater than the universe or nature to set those laws AND because they work in unison, there has to be only One Something or a Supreme Being. Cause and effect demands that this Supreme Being be above nature (not of nature) and greater than nature or the universe.

There is no way you can live in this world and consider life without a God or Supernatural Being who set the laws of nature. Oh, and by the way, a law demands that there are consequences of reward for following and punishment for rebellion. Otherwise, it would not be a law at all, but a suggestion.

you cant prove its not

A 2000 year scholarly tradition of philosophical and theological inquiry by some of history's greatest minds.... and you imagine some tool hanging out on Yahoo will be able to summarize profound truths about the power of God in the next twenty minutes?

Atheists always like to pretend some sort of intellectual superiority, but they come here to bicker and tilt at windmills instead of actually choosing to think and learn. (There are very smart people, and plenty of dumb ones too, on BOTH sides of this debate, but questions like this are not on the smart side).

What's next....10 points for the meaning of life? and another 10 for the one who can teach you theoretical physics in a single evening? And another who will give you the single insight required to become a world chess champion? and another 10 for the purpose of the universe?

Believers are so dense and are not up on the latest cosmology. e.g. There is no such thing as nothing.

"A scenario is suggested by which the universe and its laws could have arisen naturally from "nothing." Current cosmology suggests that no laws of physics were violated in bringing the universe into existence. The laws of physics themselves are shown to correspond to what one would expect if the universe appeared from nothing. There is something rather than nothing because something is more stable."

- Victor Stenger

Adjunct Professor of Philosophy, University of Colorado

Professor Emeritus of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii (retired in 2000)

The phrase "the Buybull says" makes what comes after absolutely worthless.

No proof is needed when something is obvious. There is currently an overwhelming amount of Christ-based testimonial evidence from all over the world. But don't take my word for it, go look yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXM960QtnXQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdUGoFTfP7w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMCHYR420Gw

the universe came from something or somewhere , but a" god " pall;eeze....

There must be something that created the Universe, because it would be absurd to say that it has always existed indefinitely.

God is that something.

Ergo, God.

- Extremely simplified version of W.L. Craig's discredited Kalam Cosmological Argument.

Don't you think it's a bit unfair to give people a legitimately impossible task? Oh well, I know a lot will try. I have no evidence to offer you.

Atheists dont believe in God

the bible says theyre fools

arguing with a fo0ol is stupid

the bible says dont argue with a fool