Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Raven
Lv 5
Raven asked in SportsWrestling · 7 years ago

Any idea why WWE decided to go with Reigns vs Orton instead of vs Triple H?

I guess those plans went south?

BQ: I just found out Sheamus has been out with a bad case of the Flu. Is he better now?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    Not sure but Reigns vs Triple H would of been better.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    HHH shouldn't even be allowed to wrestle he lost at wm28 against the undertaker and as that was declared an "end of an era" match, the only things HHH should be doing is COO things but writers suck. they also think "never coming back" means "coming back in a year"

    Source(s): or even just a couple of days, like cm punk.
  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    HHH is not going to wrestle on a regular basis. He did it for a match against DB and a couple with evolution but that's about it.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    I guess they're saving that match for NOC.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    hhh isnt an active wrestler as much. . either hes taking a vacation or just being semi retired now as ceo. he might do a mania like mcmahon here and there. Thats my guess

  • 7 years ago

    it is best for bizness Reigns vs Orton

  • ?
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    It could happen later; and who knows, this might become a Triple Threat too!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.