Is it unjust that we consider batsmen as the greatest players of cricket while there many great bowlers as well?

Question

I mean really?Nearly 95% questions in the cricket section about the greatest players in cricket are always ranking batsmen at the top.And not only them with,the rankings about greatest players given on the internet is the same.Never have I seen a bowler in the Top 3.

But that doesn't mean I'm saying the best player was a bowler as it is impossible to consider owing to the range of cricketers.That spot is undisputed and will remain but what about this unjust system of ranking batsman at the top?

Anonymous · Answer

Yeah it is well consider batsman as the greatest players of cricket among so many bowlers becoz of having low score doesn't matter the way to watch or not to like the cricket...So audience also like to see the batting not much more interest in bowling. They see matches that hopeful to watch runs on the board.

Anonymous · Answer

Yes indeed, it is unjust to consider batsmen as the greatest players of cricket. These day's the bats are thick and light and the tracks are mostly batsman friendly giving no chance whatsoever for the bowlers.

The Legend Of Wasim Akram · Answer

ONLY great legend Wasim Akram is known as King of Swing Bowling. So a title of respect is there for many bowlers. Its not like that what u are saying. A beautiful bowling is just as interesting as beautiful batting to people who have conceptual knowledge of Cricket rather than factual.

Anonymous · Answer

Of course Yes

Anonymous · Answer

Yes.

Rohan · Answer

its becoz batting is more enjoyable while playing and watching cricket

Trending News

Is it unjust that we consider batsmen as the greatest players of cricket while there many great bowlers as well?

6 Answers