Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is light a form of energy, even though it is composed of photons, which have a (very small) mass?
THe definition of energy states that "energy does not have mass", however, as far as i know, photons are the components of light, and although their mass is negligible, it is still there. So my question is: theoretically speaking, is light to be considered as a form of energy or not? Thanks.
4 Answers
- OldPilotLv 76 years agoFavorite Answer
Light has mass?
Light particles (Photons) are pure energy and exist only when in motion. We can debate if photons have mass. Because of Einstein's E = Mc^2 matter and energy are 2 forms of the same thing. Since photons have energy it can be argued that they have Relativistic Mass. On the other hand, Einstein was uncomfortable with the concept of Relativistic Mass because:
Many contemporary authors such as Taylor and Wheeler avoid using the concept of relativistic mass altogether:
"The concept of "relativistic mass" is subject to misunderstanding. That's why we don't use it. First, it applies the name mass - belonging to the magnitude of a 4-vector - to a very different concept, the time component of a 4-vector. Second, it makes increase of energy of an object with velocity or momentum appear to be connected with some change in internal structure of the object. In reality, the increase of energy with velocity originates not in the object but in the geometric properties of spacetime itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_spe%E2%80%A6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_e...
Scroll Down to “Relativistic Mass”
In any case, photons have zero Rest Mass.
- oldprofLv 76 years ago
No way does the definition say that "energy does not have mass". That might be the description of some property of energy, but it's not its definition.
Second, photons have no... none... nada... niente... neechevo... invariant (rest) mass. They are mass-less. In fact we can show that nothing can have the slightest bit of mass and still go the speed of light. My point is that you are wrong; it isn't there.
Bottom line, photons are pure energy, which we can find by E = hF, where h is a constant and F is the frequency of the photons.
Source(s): Energy: The capability to do work or cause a change. That's the definition. It's worthwhile memorizing and understanding the ramifications. - formerly_bobLv 76 years ago
Your premise that photons have mass is incorrect, or at least, its inconsistent with the photon theory. Whats odd about his theory is that photons are believed to behave like particles even though they have no mass. Photons are simply a quantity of light, which is pure energy.