Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Should I have killed the snake?
So I found this snake at a park and I caught it and wanted to keep it after a closer look I realized it was a baby rattle snake. So I let it go. The park is full of people and I feel like because I didn't kill it what if it bites someone and I could have done something to prevent it, but where do I stand on a snake that did nothing to me and is hated because of its venom
8 Answers
- 6 years ago
Snakes of every kind do not bite without being provoked first. If someone is bit, it is either because they were harassing it or stepped upon it accidentally. Regardless, it is, at most, a fault of the victim, and natural selection running its course. If people watch where they step or put other appendages, be a responsible parent if they are and supervise their kids as they're supposed to do, and apply common sense when a snake is encountered, (in other words, leave it alone) then there is no risk of incident. In all, the snake is not any sort of severe public safety threat by any means. They want nothing more than to be left alone in peace.
Even then, there is no guarantee that you identified it correctly as a venomous snake, but venom or not, do not just kill an animal for mere existing. They're a good animal to have in the local environment as they play a vital role as secondary predators, and their population numbers are threatened as it is due to the aforementioned persecution for merely existing and being the center of irrational phobias for many people.
In all, the chance that an animal "might" be a threat in the mind of irrational phobics is never a valid reason to kill a wild animal.
Also, future advice, make sure you can properly identify the species of snake before handling it. Being unable to do so can at least cost you an entire limb, if not your life. And if there is a snake, or a bear, or a puma, or any other animal that could be potentially dangerous and is in an unwanted area, it is best to call a local parks and wildlife officer or animal removal specialist to have them properly relocate the animal, which is better - and safer - than outright killing it.
- οικοςLv 76 years ago
Most of the snakes that people claim are rattlesnakes are non-venomous. It's a good thing that you let it live.
When I was a grad student we could count on being called out every time there was heavy rain that forced snakes to higher ground. We were most happy when they reported coral snakes. Those were usually king snakes. The "cottonmouths" were water snakes of some sort. "Rattlesnakes" were usually DeKay's snakes. AKA brown snakes.
- joeparker67Lv 66 years ago
Did you take a pic of it? What makes you think it was a rattle snake.
Don't listen to lakelady if you want to keep your fingers
- KiraLv 56 years ago
It's good that you left it alone. The snake won't hurt anyone unless they mess with it.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ?Lv 46 years ago
rattle snakes are benefical creatures they help maintain the rodent population better to let it go where you found it and consider yourself lucky you didnt get bit the baby rattlers are just as poisonous as the adults and as far as bitting someone they avoid human contact and only bite if they feel threatend in some way
- lakeladyLv 76 years ago
A baby rattlesnake doesn't have enough venom to kill a bunny rabbit. It won't stay in the park. That kind of greenspace isn't it's desired habitat. It will move somewhere drier. Don't worry.
- 6 years ago
Sorry to say but it's probably to late. You might not find it. You should of put it I a box and took it to a pet store and asked them what to do. If you find it do that
Source(s): I'm just guessing.. LOL