Do you agree with Republicans that "A compelling story, even if factually inaccurate, can be more emotionally compelling?

Certainly-

Lyin' Brian would never OMIT a scary escapade- he's ADD ONE, though!

The factually inaccurate intel that we all knew was FALSE

that caused us to bomb and invade Iraq

sure was scary! emotionally compelling- like a beheading.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is compelling, not to mention instructive, yet not factual.

As long as its labelled as Fiction.

People don't like being deceived or lied to with stories pretending to be true that are not.

There's no problem so long as you're clear that you're telling the story to make a point, and that it isn't to be taken as true story.

Yes, Democrats agree with that statement. They prove this every four to eight years.

A juicy lie tops a dull fact every time.

"We're not going to let fact checkers run our campaign" - Mitt Romney, says it all, pretty much a license to lie.

I noticed alot of libs drooling over "Hope and Change"

Reagan was a master at this. He actually believed the stories himself.

Are you asking about how Hillary embellished on being under sniper fire?