Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Honestly, how much of an idiot am I right now?
Writing a novel? series? undecided. The current project takes place in a school for the gifted in military matters that I only realized after the fact was a subconscious ripoff of Battle School, but my book has transhumanist themes and lesbians where Card had religious imagery and casual sexism so I'm probably still doing okay. That's not what I'm here to ask about.
There are precisely sixty children in this school, and they stay (mostly) constant throughout the years and years of schooling. Even if the project winds up being a novel, it will be an extremely long novel. It occurred to me, early in drafting stages, that it would be a fairly good idea to plot out all the children in the school. Not even a chapter's worth of backstory, but a quick "where do they come from and what can they do" plus physical descriptions, names, and occasional motivations/plot advancing hooks.) This is a good idea, obviously, in adding verisimilitude to my story world, fleshing out the setting of the world, bruteforcing enough character generation that I can get secondary characters the readers and I can actually tolerate, et cetera. The reader will almost certainly not experience all these characters firsthand. If their names are mentioned, it'll be just that- a mention. But making characters is hard. Am I expending unnecessary effort here that I should be spending on other parts of the story? Card left most of his schoolchildren unnamed, but Rowling has notes on them all, leaving me conflicted
Realizing now that there's a pretty good (probably about a seventy percent) chance that I basically just asked this question so that someone would come around and say "no, Davirk, don't do the hard work, just write the cute part where they meet for the first time, who cares who might be in the room with them and have relevant commentary" and I actually know that doing what I'm doing is the right thing to do and I just want to skip the laborious parts. Leaving the question up because why not.
11 Answers
- mikah_smilesLv 76 years agoFavorite Answer
I've done this. My protagonist is part of a large family and familial bonds are important to her. She doesn't interact with every member of her family (absent from the story) but I have notes on each. It helps me visualize her role in the family, as well as how she reacts to certain people due to her relationship with another. I even have notes on her ex-boyfriend so I can tell how she will relate to her new love interest.
If it feels right, do it.
- ?Lv 76 years ago
I don't think you're being an idiot.
I mean giving other characters names and history gives your story depth. Instead of having nameless and faceless strangers buzzing around your protagonist and minor characters, you have real people and people you care about. You're not wasting energy by mentioning them -- you're giving your characters a populated world.
Stick with it. These characters obviously serve some purpose or they wouldn't be in your novel. Even if it is just that they flesh out your scenes and give your characters more depth it's fine. These extra characters often help readers see how the protagonist acts when not around friends -- good character development.
- 6 years ago
No, you aren't. If you're free-writing the story and decide you want to develop one of the characters, but you've only mentioned a name and have no backstory of any kind on them, how will it be for you? Not very good. I like Rowling's choice of making notes for every single name, and even names that were never mentioned. Card's method makes me feel detached from the story, and makes it clear to me that it's simply that - a story. Rowling's method lets you get lost in the (excuse the upcoming pun) magic of it all.
- Madame MLv 76 years ago
There is nothing new under the sun. Even Shakespeare was riffin' off older authors. As long as you make it yours, it's OK.
Unless you really don't want to do the work. In that case, just write the fun parts. (-: Better hobby than a lot of things you could do with your time!
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- TinaLv 76 years ago
Well, producing names, descriptions and so on for sixty characters, many of whom you may not use, or only mention briefly could be a way to avoid getting down to writing the actual story. Some writers make tea, do the washing and run the vacuum cleaner over the carpets some do elaborate world-building, or plan out their story arc...all of this could be useful, could be an avoidance strategy.
- KernelLv 46 years ago
It's a good practice to do it and useful for you for planning and the like, but I would not suggest telling the reader every single character's name unless they appear more than once or are important to the story. It usually bores the reader and makes them forget the more important stuff in an attempt to remember all of the names.
- ?Lv 76 years ago
Dude, relax.
Are you having fun writing? Come on, get in there and make things happen. Raise up armies and bring down empires. Destroy lives and dreams and build heroes and villains and be the god of what you create and know that nobody can do what you do.
Seriously, I think you know what good writing is made of and from your question, I think you're like me where you might be overthinking things. That's why I say relax and write.