Christians: Do you really believe in the Adam & Eve and Noah's Ark story?

The stories in the bible are plausible if you take them the way they are written, instead of letting ignoramuses tell you what they say. For example, ignoramuses talk about "six days of creation." The bible says "In the beginning god created the heaven and the earth." No six days, it was in the beginning. Ignoramuses say light ws created on this day and grass was created on that day and then they tally up the contradictions in that vrsion and demand that we beievers explain them away. Well, all you have to do is to stop listening to the ignoramuses.

There were eye witnesses to that story. You didn't know that, did you? The ignoramuses ignored the records. They dismissed them as "myths". Well, those myths are preserved in every culture all around the world, and they all tell the same story. Here is an analysis of all the myths going back to 12,500 BC. This is a long book because it tries to cover everything completely.

http://saturniancosmology.org/

Lots of specially trained smart people have looked hard for evidence of a world wide flood. They found two. Neither of them was Noah's flood of 2349 BC. Nevertheless, people all over the world recorded a flood that year and they all agreed on all the details. You might be surprised to learn what actually happened. Here is the section about Noah:

http://saturniancosmology.org/noah.php

Christians: Do you really believe in the Adam & Eve and Noah's Ark story?

Pangea = Noah's 1st ark. There was no "Big Bang" (which sounds awful; demons created this term to mock deceived Christians). Dinosaurs are born in hell, whereas apemen are changed people.

Apemen and elephantmen are cursed masons from tower of Babel. Read Book of Jasher, Chapter 9, verse 35. And the Lord smote the three divisions that were there, and He punished them according to their works and designs; those who said, We will ascend to heaven and serve our gods, became like apes and elephants...

According to Russian Orthodox Christian Vyatcheslav Krasheninnikov: Humans were created about 7525 years ago. Birds participate in time creation. It's a sin to kill birds. Feed the pigeons; when pigeons bow down, people are rescued from hell. Dinosaurs live under our level. They will get out through sinkholes and lakes. To kill them, go for their nerves. Vyatcheslav Krasheninnikov said that first dinosaur will come out of Volga River.

Animals on the ark ate minimal to survive. Only animals that knelt before Noah went inside the 2nd ark. Other animals and 700 000 people drowned.

Zodiac = planetary prison of demons; don't believe in horoscopes.

Earth stands on three pillars (representing the Most Holy Trinity); pillars stand on water (at zero Kelvin).

Forgive me.

Noah's Ark: A biblical story with moral underpinnings, but lacks actual evidence for its occurrence; both the Ark and a World Wide flood. From a scientific perspective and our knowledge about how nature works, a critical analysis of the story is shown at: http://ncse.com/cej/4/1/impossible-voyage-noahs-ar... After you read this analysis, you will see why the story fails the evidence test, not just on one aspect of the story, but on hundreds of logistical and factual inconsistencies with present day workings of nature. It's one thing to have a belief that God Did It, it's another to twist reality and ignore the evidence from biology, geology, demography, and even the science and physics of ship building (that is covered in the article) that makes the story impossible.

Although repeated endlessly by Creationists, about the evidence for a world-wide flood, there is no evidence. Read: http://www.chem.tufts.edu/science/franksteiger/eld... Nor as an integral part of the myth is the earth only 6,000 years old http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_against_a_re...

In addition, Creationists will tell you the 8 people on the Ark had enough time in only a few thousand years to repopulate the earth and contribute to the genetic diversity of present day human populations. A careful analysis of that assumption from the perspective of molecular biology, population genetics, and demography (human populations over time) shows how improbable and impossible is that scenario. http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/2009_...

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Global_flood#Re-popul...

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/may04...

Humans evolved over 200,000 years ago in Africa, and that we do have evidence for.

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence and mitochondrial DNA shows the migration patterns of humans out of Africa:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mitochondrial_D...

Two of the stories in the BuyBull that are:

1) Utterly ridiculous.

2) Still unprovable and mythical to this day

3) Stories that are verified as having come from earlier cult/myths and paganism.

4) Complete Fatal Flaws in simple logic.

That they believe this crap is remarkable and intellectually astonishing.

Yes, I really believe Genesis was an inspired cosmology. Do I believe all of it is literal history, no. I will grant, that if it were taken as literal history and science, God would indeed appear as an evil monster, that is why the "rest of the story" is so important.

I have long ago stopped believing and I do agree with your post about god being evil or else he/she, if god really exist, would not inflict suffering to the innocents and materially reward the evil doers. I have also come to believe that god was thought of by man in order to control the masses.

Yes.

And to your second question, No, it does not make God seem like a evil man.

He clearly provided all that Adam and Eve needed, and then require of them only ONE thing, obedience. And it was no big thing. Of the thousands of trees in the Garden of Eden, he pointed to one and said "That tree is mine. Don't eat from it".

As for Noah, God saw wicked angels abandoning their position in his service to become organic creatures in order to have sex and procreate amongst mankind. The corruption filled the earth with a violence that we have only reached in our modern era. Most of the people accepted that way of life and lived with the degrading morality that resulted from the demons taking any women from their families and husbands in order to fornicate with them.

God had to end this way of life, and since men had spread out over the earth, and the corruption was down to the basic level of life, he saved the one family that had refused to join in that life, and who had spoken out against it.

Again, it was a condition that those involved knew was wrong, and that there would be consequences. Especially the angels who chased after a perversion of their nature, who had resided with God in heaven for billions of year.

I see no "angry evil man", but one of a Father that sought to protect his Family from the degrading and corrupting influences that deserved death for what they had done.

Some here are saying that this was simply justice, and that God was "disciplining his children". Really? So the best way to discipline your children is to KILL the disobedient ones? And do I even have to mention all the innocent animals and babies that died because of this? Fundementalist Christians: your God, is an irresponsible, evil, stupid God.

I'm pretty glad the Christian God doesn't exist, clearly if he was real he would be a very angry and depressed person, I'm pretty happy that's all fiction.

Because He disciplined His children for disobeying His orders?

Every good parent does that, don't they?