Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Alion
Lv 7
Alion asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 6 years ago

Should Jeb Bush go back in time and kill Hitler as a baby?

This is actually a question Jeb was asked and he had no problem answering it,so I hope it doesn't offend anyone. This is not chatting,has no links to external sites,and is not meant to be offensive to other members of the Y/A community. So I hope that those of you who are compulsive about reporting questions arbitrarily can contain yourselves and move on.

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    That's really a non-issue. Anyone who doesn't think the world would have been better off without Hitler is really warped. However, there have been some interesting books positing that if Hitler hadn't existed, someone else would have assumed that role. In other words, many of the events of WWII were inevitable, resulting from harsh penalties put on Germany after WWI, and the tendency to blame everything on the weakest group, which was the Jews.

  • 6 years ago

    No, but this is how the typical republican mind works. They love the fetus and hate the child. They lack the ability to entertain two separate ideas at the same time. An intelligent person would have come up with a more options, a better idea, a real plan for how to improve existing conditions that led to those events. A time travler could have brought Hitler's mother back into the future when she was a child, thus preventing Hitler's birth.

    Imagine, having the ability to go back through time and prevent such a disaster and the only idea that Jeb Bush could come up with was killing a baby. Hitler didn't act alone so Bush would have had to kill several babies, but then then he would be no better than Hitler.

  • Donald
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    I don't understand all the debate about Bush and baby Hitler. Hitler was directly responsible for 6+ million deaths, plus tens of millions of additional deaths of Russians and Germans. Of course it would have benefited civilization if Hitler had been eliminated before he could do harm.

  • 6 years ago

    jeb has never fought in any war. he has never in his little secluded guarded life even come close to killing anyone or anything. to come up with the nonsense of him going back and killing hitler clearly shows how ineffective his campaign has been. i think the voters realize that a third bush in the white house would be a horrible mistake.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Alion
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    Just got to say,I don't think I've ever posted a question and gotten so many answers that were actually worth reading. Only one wasn't,which I won't single out. I wish I could choose more than one B.A.

  • 6 years ago

    Why doesn't he go back in time and kill Reagan who's actions we're still paying for?

  • 6 years ago

    any Sci-fi fan knows of untended consequences ; what if instead another crazy politicians rises from the ashes of the Weimar Republic but this time upholds a treaty with Stalin?

  • 6 years ago

    I'll only vote for him if he does this.

  • 6 years ago

    No, hitler tried to defeat the soviet union, why do you support communism?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.