would you rather watch the super bowl on tv or go the actual city?

I no longer watch the Superbowl. But if I did, I prefer TV because it's just too much craziness with the traffic, crowds, booking a place, all the hassles of flying today (uh, no thanks). And unless I spend a lot of money, I can't see a thing without binoculars. Why bother unless being in the middle of all that is my cup of tea. TV is the preferred choice where I actually know what exactly is happening. Just don't care for all the commercials.

Depends on the city. I like to eat "Mexican" food during the big game. If it was in Detroit or New Orleans, then no way. I would go if it was in Miami or Southern California.

With all that being said, that's only if money was no object and I could get whatever food I wanted.

Unless I cared about the outcome I'd rather save the money and watch at home. The games are usually boring and halftime is even worse.

Actual city.

Go to the actual city and watch the best commercials afterwards.

I live in Alaska...love it here because there's not many people, along with all the natural beauty. Therefore, I'd have to say TV...no crowds.

TV. Better views and my own food and drink. Unless I had seats in a box suite at the game.

Watch it on TV.

I'd rather be at their game. The atmosphere isn't the same on television.

If I could ever afford it, I would go in person but usually just watch it on the tube or online.