Who's loss was worse..cincy or Minnesota?

I would say Cincinnati's was too because their players decided to go bone head at the end of the game as opposed to a missed kick in bad weather conditions.

If it weren't for the weather, the Vikings wouldn't have stood a chance today. Old Man Winter was their friend today. If the weather were any warmer or they were playing in Seattle, then the Vikings would have been blown out again.

Bengals is worse because they had the game won without 2 bad penalties, with no timeouts Pitt would have been lucky to get off a 50+ yard FG at best. Vikings played well, just choked.

Physical failure is part of the game and happens, mental breakdowns and a lack of discipline are inexcusable mistakes that professionals should never commit. You feel bad for Walsh but what happened in Cincy was stupidity that doesnt deserve anybodies sympathy.

Bungles loss was worse because they haven't won a playoff game since 1990.

Cincinnati...that game will forever be known as the Bungle in the Jungle. In the future when they show film of the game you'll hear Jethro Tull's song Bungle in the Jungle in the background.

Bengals as if you leave the game to a kick, you've left it to chance instead of a football play.

Cincinnati. They had the ball and the lead with under 2 minutes to play and totally imploded

and Cincinnati lost to a division opponent. and Cincinnati lost to the same division opponent that beats them in the postseason quite a bit. complete mental breakdown by the Bengals in the last 2 minutes and it just goes to show you, you have to finish. 60 minutes, not 59

I don't believe in good losses they're all bad. ..........................