Punishment for Bestiality/Zoophilia?

Now, that obama legalized homosexuality, the predicted next extension to other perversions has begun. As indicated by your question. Perhaps there is a psychologist who can make a list of all the perversions in some sort of progression to degradation. In typical fashion, the gullible libs question why an act is a perversion and who are the victims. As you might expect, in a few years, someone will have a special breed of dog trained for providing this service. And, there will be other people who will form rescue organizations to save the dogs. You can almost see the division between the sexual rights group vs. the dog rescue groups going to battle. The politicians will have to come up with some new laws and there will be the legal battle over whether or not the sexual act has to be between the same species to be legal. The libs will come up with some phobia name for anyone who thinks people should stick people, and dogs should stick dogs. But, to answer you question, it would be far better for everyone if both the friend and the dog were killed, but they only have a mechanism for the dog. I will go with the muslims on this one.

I've read of this in news articles a few times over the years. They always claim their reason for executing the animal is because "the animal can't be untrained from desiring sex from a human", which is pure bullsh!t considering all the habits and behaviors that can be trained into and trained out of animals. They just don't even want to think about the matter, let alone take the time to train the dog if he/she shows sexual interests in other humans, so they figure murder is a better option. They never even take a moment to consider that the animal has every bit as much of an intricate personality as a human and may have very selective preferences over who he/she wants to have sex with, or the fact that animals show sexual interest in humans all the time due to simply being horny, or the fact it's entirely possible there was no abuse whatsoever and the sexual activity was fully consensual. It's much the same reasoning as the push to get every animal spayed or castrated; people are so uptight about matters of sex they don't even want to think about the idea of animals having a sex drive, being horny, or engaging in and enjoying the pleasures of sex, so they have the animal's gonads cut out to eliminate any of that much to the detriment of the animal's physical development due to lack of proper hormone levels.

I see a possibility.

Owner goes to jail, therefore dog goes to Animal Control.

Time goes by and the dog doesn't get adopted, therefore Animal Control does what it does to un-adopted animals.

This scenario is marginally better than leaving the dog in the (now empty) house of the jailed owner.

They would only euthanize the dog if there were serious injuries to the animal. Since someone having sex with a dog could easily cause major internal injuries and internal bleeding, that would be the reason why they euthanized the dog. A human penis is much larger than a dog's penis and could cause serious internal injury to the animal

Problem is she taught the dog it's OK to have sex with a person. So now it isn't safe for others.

Why does the illuminati practice beastiality ? David Icke said that they were reptiles that shape shift

Sounds improbable (at best).

Troll stinkin up the place.