Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 5
? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 5 years ago

Why do democrats have to cheat to win elections?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Yes, along with Mob action that will Protest, Riot, Loot and intimidate anyone they disagree with all the time. Just use Unions and there Goons as an example, or any Conservative that try to speak at a University and was threatened, attacked and not allowed to speak (ie Ann Coulter). Need I go on?

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Do you mean cheat like when Bush stole the election from Gore?

  • Jeff S
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    Actually it is one of your candidates who was caught doing that recently!

    Didn't Teddy's campaign send out a press release that Carson was suspending his campaign during one of the first primaries?

  • 5 years ago

    Do you mean like gerrymandering so republicans get more than a representative share in the house?

    Gerrymandering Rigged the 2014 Elections for GOP Advantage

    November 5, 2014

    by Lee Fang

    This post first appeared at Republic Report.

    In the midterm elections, Republicans appear to have won their largest House majority since the Hoover administration. Republicans won on the weakness of Democratic candidates, a poor resource allocation strategy by Democratic party leaders, particularly DCCC chair Steve Israel, and an election narrative that did little to inspire base Democratic voters. That being said, in many ways, the game was rigged from the start. The GOP benefitted from the most egregious gerrymandering in American history.

    As Rolling Stone reported, GOP donors plowed cash into state legislative efforts in 2010 for the very purpose of redrawing congressional lines. In the following year, as the tea party wave brought hundreds of Republicans into office, newly empowered Republican governors and state legislatures carved congressional districts for maximum partisan advantage. Democrats attempted this too, but only in two states: Maryland and Illinois. For the GOP however, strictly partisan gerrymandering prevailed in Ohio, Pennsylvania Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Arizona, Tennessee and beyond.

    Here’s an example from the election last night. In Pennsylvania, one state in which the GOP drew the congressional districts in a brazenly partisan way, Democratic candidates collected 44 percent of the vote, yet Democratic candidates won only 5 House seats out of 18. In other words, Democrats secured only 27 percent of Pennsylvania’s congressional seats despite winning nearly half of the votes. See the graph below:

    A similar dynamic played in North Carolina, another state in which GOP control in 2011 created intensely partisan congressional boundaries. In the 2014 midterm elections, Democrats in North Carolina secured only three out of 13 seats (23 percent of NC’s congressional delegation) even though Democratic candidates in that state won about 44 percent of the vote:

    In 2012, the first congressional election after the last round of gerrymandering, Democratic House candidates won 50.59 percent of the vote — or 1.37 million more votes than Republican candidates — yet secured only 201 seats in Congress, compared to 234 seats for Republicans. The House of Representatives, the “people’s house,” no longer requires the most votes for power.

    As the results from this year roll in, we see a similar dynamic. Republican gerrymandering means Democratic voters are packed tightly into single districts, while Republicans are spread out in such a way to translate into the most congressional seats for the GOP.

    There are a lot of structural issues that influence congressional elections, from voter ID requirements to early voting access. But what does it matter if you’ve been packed into a district in which your vote can’t change the composition of Congress.

    http://billmoyers.com/2014/11/05/gerrymandering-ri...

    Great article

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/why...

    rolling stone

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-repu...

    or

    Unnecessary voter ID laws

    Voter ID laws a solution in search of a nonexistent problem

    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voi...

    or

    is it Republican Purging legitimate Voter registrations (other states too)

    Florida GOP Takes Voter Suppression to a Brazen New Extreme

    Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/florida-...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 5 years ago

    Dodgiest president ever Richard Nixon, a republican, say no more

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    They don't.

  • 5 years ago

    huh

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.