Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
4 Answers
- Anonymous5 years agoFavorite Answer
There have been a number of schemes suggested over a decade or more, such as eg. anyone can pay a small amount each month then download anything they like legally.
The media companies would get millions from it; everyone is happy.
Each suggestion has been blocked, apparently by the "lawyers" in charge of such agreements.
I'm convinced the lawyers that represent media companies _want_ piracy to continue, to keep them in work.
If any download scheme was agreed, they would all be out of a job; legality is the last thing they want.
*Every* previous new media distribution recording / copying system was fought against for years before being accepted; downloads / torrents are no different.
(Items 1, 2, 6 & 9 in this list for some examples
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5874655/10-technologies-tha... )
If people keep downloading, eventually they will have to find a way to legalise it - as with previous media technologies.
- 5 years ago
That anon answer is absolutely right. If people could pay what they're able to, to support the artists, everyone would be better off. But instead ppl who can't afford to buy music at ridiculous prices instead opt to download illegally. I say, if the artist is already rolling in dough, or if it's an incredibly old album, download it. If it's a smaller artists or new music, support them if you're able. Rule of thumb, don't be a selfish asshole, without money your fave bands wouldn't be doing ****, but still do what you're able and you shouldn't feel horrible if you literally cannot pay for the music you're listening to.