Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
9 Answers
- JimZLv 74 years agoFavorite Answer
Honestly, it sounds like McCarthy knew it was 400 ppmV so not being able to calculate 400/1,000,000 in her head isn't as bad as not knowing it was 400 ppmV. I hope the Trump focuses his attention on obvious attempts to exaggerate the consequence of those concentrations and the actual costs to our economy. Pruitt is a good step in that direction.
- Anonymous4 years ago
In 2014, The New York Times found that a letter Pruitt sent to the EPA challenging estimates of emissions from natural gas wells in Oklahoma was actually written by Devon Energy, one of the oil and gas companies working in the state. The attorney general simply added his letterhead and signature. The report identified several other letters to federal agencies that had also been written by Devon Energy.
Pruitt is a wholly owned subsidiary of the oil industry, seems like Trump is draining the swamp right into his administration or maybe he is hoping to drain the swamp by letting climate change do all the work...
- MichaelLv 74 years ago
All non solids like co2, exhaust, smoke, gases, etc. that rise in the upper atmosphere is separated by Nature's icy chemicals so the suns rays can warm earth as earth rotates to grow plants to make oxygen & food so all species can survive as it has done since earth was formed from the beginning of time. Mike
Source(s): Earth's Logic - Wage SlaveLv 64 years ago
The real question is how much CO2 will lead to catastrophic global warming. Let's ask the folks at 350.org. {Hint: the answer is not 350 ppm or 400 ppm.}
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- vulcan_alexLv 74 years ago
I believe that there is no accurate way to determine the CO2 in the global atmosphere. After all we use one place to estimate it.
- ?Lv 54 years ago
Perhaps--it depends on how good he is with numbers. But I would give you 50 to 1 odds that he would get the amount of water vapor wrong.
- Anonymous4 years ago
He may well but as with Rohrabacher, he wont know what that means