Liberals. Is there anything wrong in this picture?

“ROBOSEXUAL” (HA HA)

I have no problem with such a marriage if it is purely

a religious ceremony since this marriage harms nobody.

I wouldn’t want it to be legally recognized however.

This is because the robot could eventually gain legal rights

as a spouse; rights such as unemployment insurance,

malpractice compensation settlements, etc.

This would lead to abuses of rights offered to humans.

And really, I shouldn’t pay taxes that benefit robot mates.

Can you imagine making 50 robot children for your

household and receiving financial government

assistance to raise your offspring robots?

No, no, no – I say no thanks to legal robosexual marriage.

Btw, why do you not want the republican viewpoint?

I’m a liberal residing in New York, NY, USA.

From a purely legal perspective, your argument is complete BS. An inanimate object (nor an animal for that matter) can enter a legally binding contract, which is what a marriage is. So please stop talking about men marrying their dog or whatever. A human being is not a dog or a toaster or a robot. So you cant make the comparison.

Nice try

To be honest, whatever. It is her life. It is strange, but I am in no room to make her choices. Legally, however, it should be treated differently from marriage, unless AI gets to the point of robots being capable of emotion and human-like thought.

For those people saying that she can t because it is an inanimate object ant cannot sign legal forms maybe she could program it to sign things.

You should look up the animals and things people married in other Countries

A robot can't sign legal forms.

They'd believe she could marry herself!!

How is wondering what others are doing working out for you, dazzle me with your bank balances.